Quote Originally Posted by Waterways View Post
It is clear you lack the intelligence to grasp the points I put across so clearly.

The Loop is NOT tiny at all, it goes around the city centre, suing the Waterloo and Dingle tunnels running through inner city areas that require regeneration. If you had read and understood the posts you would have grasped this long ago. About 80% of its tunnels are in place now. From Dingle to Edge Hill can take the tunnel across parts Princes Park, which is easy to do by cut and cover. Do you understand that? I ask as you keep coming back with the same misunderstandings.





That I have not done, only stating the capability of flexible routing is a great bonus and pretty essential in an expanding city.



There is NO firm plan ahead. Everything is off the cuff. The implementing of trams (the lines were delivered) was asinine, when essential disused rail infrastructure was laying there waiting to be used, which would bring far more benefits to an expanding and growing city. Trams figure - but only back burner. They foolishly brought to the front burner.



Yes. our legacy is a great advantage - and it is not being utilised. Putting in trams schemes is not using existing infrastructure.



Post No. 20 is on a city map.



That is exactly what I proposed. Look at the posts. It is what it does to serve the people and project the city that matters - never lose sight of that.
I have understood you perfectly well. Perhaps when you grow up, you will understand that you should give credit for people being somewhat brighter than you at first imagine - particularly when you don't know who you are talking to or indeed in this case, what you are talking about.

I am afraid I won't bother to reply to you again as I have better things to do, thank you