Quote Originally Posted by Ged View Post
So in saying you want buildings of high carbon footprint demolishing WW, I take that also to mean the whole of the Canning area - is that correct
They are buildings of historic importance, the garden were not. They can have the insulation values uprated far more easily than brick block with landing protruding acts as heat sinks.



I too want to progress and a perfectly good site such as the tunnel loop which is overgrown with weeds in an area that needs regeneration is so easily discounted by you as not big enough when a leading world stadium construction company says it is - who should we believe WW
The stadium company would say that. The Loop site is totally crap. A stadium needs a rapid transit rail station incorporated. Guess what, Liverpool has a one and people ignore it. The Loop site cannot incorporate rapid-transit rail. If any is run in it will be footy traffic only, so EFC would have to foot the biog bill. WHP can have all and funded out of public fund and all benefit.

The Loop is another ill-thought out idea, as is the Stanley Park stadium. A stadium without rapid-transit. LFC must be daft to design a stadium without rapid-transit as they have all to gain by having it. The city is mad to allow such nuisance creators at footy stadia not have use it. London look at Liverpool and think the city is daft. EFC and LFC need rethinks on where to their stadia. EFC, hopefully not in Kirkby.