Three problems with Murphy's book/hypothesis:
div>
-The notion Wallace made the call. Sorry, but no way Beattie wouldn't recognize him. Never mind that he 'wasn't expecting' to him and therefore didn't pick up on it. And no way Wallace would risk being heard (never mind being seen!) to make that call. One slip up or the slightest suspicion from Beattie and he would be toast.
-The timing is ludicrous. Even if one believes Wallace did acheive it in exactly that amount of time, the problem becomes could he plot beforehand and allow himself such a tight time?...if anything goes even slightly wrong...takes a minute too long and he's screwed. The timing is precariously tight (and Murphy's setting it back to 6:35 from 6:45 with such certainty is laughable) but even assuming a miracle, it is way too iffy to be planned out as such. Murphy's counter-argument to this is Wallace could make his timeframe up as he went along and then leave immediately to create the perfect alibi. Um...does Murphy forget Wallace had the fixed appointment time of 7:30 with Qualtrough? I believe the murder happened later (at around 7:30) when Wallace was out being seen mid-trip searching for Qualtrough. It was only the poor work of J Mcfall and the picking apart of the milk boy's initial 6:45 statement that created doubt in the juror's minds of Wallace's perfect alibi. Of course I believe Wallace planned the murder, so I don't feel too sorry for him that his perfect plan fell apart a little bit.
-Lastly, Murphy doesn't even attempt to explain how the drains could be free of blood. I have heard some explanations that while straining credulity a bit, are at least somewhat plausible invoving caustic materials and such. But Murphy doesn't even address the idea. Of course, if Wallace did have to clean the drains, this would have added to the timeframe required.
Bookmarks