Who was the UKs worst PM and why.

[RonnieW]

http://bucf.files.wordpress.com/2008...labour-800.jpg

[Waterways]

http://bucf.files.wordpress.com/2008...labour-800.jpg

You are still very fat.

[pablo42]

You are still very fat.

Ha, why do you say that?

[wsteve55]

The US declared war on the UK. The UK went over to their country and took the war right to them even sacking the White House. When Canada was secure the UK pulled out as the had desires on US territory. Job done - the UK won. It was not a draw as many perceive the war to be.

A draw?? But such a pity the news of the the peace accord, never reached the Brit's/Scots troops, before the battle of New Orleans,where they were decimated by the militia's defending the town,basically because they had no ladders to scale the earthworks/defences!!!!

[wsteve55]

Ha, why do you say that?

Aye aye,haven't you started your diet!

[essexscouse]

I am sure I am one of the few that whilst i did not like ThatcheR she was right for her time we had a mining industry that would not accept it was bust but wanted the country to fund ongoing insolvency ditto British Leyland the mainreason she was re-elected was there was no credible Labour alternative I would also say the reason Blair was re-elected there was no credible Con alternative which brings us to today most of the country wants this government out and Cameron whilst hardly credible is acceptable only because the Brown out is so adamant
. I would also ask this question................ If the expenses malarkey was going on 30 years ago Who do you think would be up before the beak ?


Blair
Thatcher
Callaghan
Heseltine
Healy
Lamont
Churchill
Hume
Heath
add any other names you desire

[Waterways]

Ha, why do you say that?

I had another look at his anarchist party photos and was still fat.

[pablo42]

Aye aye,haven't you started your diet!

Ha, don't think he's talking about me. Well, hope not.

[pablo42]

I had another look at his anarchist party photos and was still fat.

Not nice though, all the same WW.

[RonnieW]

Not nice though, all the same WW.

Yes, it's not nice, but completely typical of the ignorant to refer to an 'anarchist party'. How could there ever be an 'anarchist' party except in the uncomprehending mind of inbred simpletons?


http://deandonaldson.files.wordpress...new_labour.jpg

[pablo42]

Yes, it's not nice, but completely typical of the ignorant to refer to an 'anarchist party'. How could there ever be an 'anarchist' party except in the uncomprehending mind of inbred simpletons?


http://deandonaldson.files.wordpress...new_labour.jpg

Don't seem that you two get on too well. Is there a history there?

[RonnieW]

Don't seem that you two get on too well. Is there a history there?

There certainly is! I can't stand these supporters of political parties who are out to do away with our civil liberties, who support dangerous nut case regimes (like George Bush for instance) who sell arms to dodgy didctators, who encourage racism, who run down the NHS, run down public transport, close schools and bomb babies in the Third World. You know, Labour Party hacks and others who support the rich. People like Watercloset for example.

[pablo42]

There certainly is! I can't stand these supporters of political parties who are out to do away with our civil liberties, who support dangerous nut case regimes (like George Bush for instance) who sell arms to dodgy didctators, who encourage racism, who run down the NHS, run down public transport, close schools and bomb babies in the Third World. You know, Labour Party hacks and others who support the rich. People like Watercloset for example.

Surely WW is against that too?

[RonnieW]

Surely WW is against that too?

He can't be. He supports the Labour Party. New Labour = Slave Labour!

[Waterways]

Yes, it's not nice, but completely typical of the ignorant to refer to an 'anarchist party'. How could there ever be an 'anarchist' party except in the uncomprehending mind of inbred simpletons?

Then why does your party have flags then? And many fat people waving them?