
Originally Posted by
irishseashipping.com
I wonder just how much is true?
In the early 90s there was a series of books about haunted airfileds by another author - the first two or three sounded plausible - but by the time volume 6 or so came along - well it all started reading a bit "woolly" if you see what I mean! Basically a successful formula was being exploited.
John
I think you've hit the nail on the head there. His earlier stories were re-tellings of Richard Whittington-Egan tales and even some that were original and possibly plausible involving common paranormal phenomenon (cloud cities, lost villages etc...).
div>
I am an open critic of Tom Slemen, and have actually been banned from his website forum for posting material that contradicts his stories. I was not rude or provocative on his forum, I simply posted some of my research). Even though I re-posted the material on Mackenzie I had first gathered here on YoLiverpool, Tom still won't accept it. Whether or not Mackenzie is buried upright pales into insignificane when Tom still believes that he was buried with his Wife and his Mistress... it was in fact his first and second wife as is recorded for all to see both on the pyramid itself and the transcription in the Liverpool Record Office (ref: H 929.5 GIB if you wanna check).
It is Toms complete lack of intellectual curiosity into other peoples points of view if they come anywhere near to criticising him that gets up my nose. It is because of his popularist, narrow-minded and self-indulgent style that he is considered by most of the 'paranormal community' to be little more than a novelty writer. Even the Jack the Ripper community (although much politer than I am) seem to be weary of him and his soon-to-be-published-but-never-actually-seen meisterwerk.
It is well known that there are other vocal critics of Tom whom he attacks as bitter and jealous unsucessful writers who are envious of his fame.
I am neither writer nor am I unsucessful, I just enjoy the persuance of historical facts over popular folklore.
Folklore has it's place of course, and I am a great lover of folktales... but when they are recognised as folktales. When the folktale starts to overtake the historical fact (as in the case of William Mackenzie) I do get annoyed.
Sorry about this rant, I know it's petty and won't make one iotas worth of difference but I was looking at a Liverpool Council Published guide and noticed the Slemen William Mckenzie story was given verbitam, without the littlest nod that he was responsible for some of the most important railway construction projects in the world... and made his home in our fair city.
Bookmarks