
Originally Posted by
Ged
I do think Manchester was helped along a little with the aid of a bomb though. Even their own commentators admit that.
They may have. However they have done a brilliant job of the rest. They managed their regeneration,and image, brilliantly.
div>
For the past 10 years there has been hot air about two new stadia in the city - so far, nothing!!!! Not one brick laid. In the meantime Manchester built a brand new stadium and has fully updated another to world class, while one club in Liverpool still has wooden stands.
I recall about three years ago Paxman interviewing an expert on regeneration on Newsnight. Paxman mentioned the regeneration in Liverpool. The expert responded that Liverpool has done little while Manchester surged ahead. He mentioned the new city centre development in Manchester and other projects, saying Liverpool would still be arguing over these and never gets anything done - the Brunswick Quay Tower comes mind - the developers said it would have been built by now. He was not complimentary towards the city at all. Those in power think this way too. When one £billion developments are thrown on their laps, they turn them down - Brunswick Quay Tower again.
The image has to be changed ASAP. A few forgettable low rise apartment buildings is not going to do that. The European City of Culture will be short lived and outside Liverpool few know of it.
The city needs an overall firm plan, moving the city to the dock waterways and river. It needs to know where it wants to go and what to do. The greatest legacy, which ever other city in the world would drool over, the redundant docks waterways, has to be used to great effect.
Read all the city planning documents and all you read is weasel words that appear to say positive things, then on closer inspection say nothing. Lots of hot air about vision, etc. Nothing firm.
Bookmarks