
Originally Posted by
shoney
in ringo's defence does liverpool owe ringo something for putting the place on the map in the sad 60's before anyone knew where the place was before these guys rocked the world, or does liverpool own him and he should be at the beck and call of all liverpudlians to keep telling everyone it is a great place when it is obvious that it needs more than a CoC makeover, plus he's his own man, tell your average scouser that he shouldn't be wearing those jeans or that he talks a bit funny cos he left the place to make a better life for him and his kids and i'm sure he'll tell you to F off, even if he is a great drummer or a crap singer, get real, he belongs to nobody, where was tarby, gerry , and cilla, , think about it, sentimentalists do my head in. I love the place but thats my fault nobody elses.
Hi Shoney
div>
It seems to me that Scousers suffer from a inferiority complex. There's also been an attitude starting in the Sixties that the Beatles turned their backs on the city, and that sentiment still remains: the only way you can be a "real Scouser" is to still live in the city. Tarbuck and Cilla have been criticized for similarly not living in the city and for not coming back. Ringo's remark was ill advised but on the other hand people should be able to look past it -- it was similar to the smart guy quips the Beatles always made. With his "Liverpool 08" CD he is spreading the word about Liverpool to people who might not know about what Liverpool has to offer.
Chris
Bookmarks