Quote Originally Posted by petromax View Post
Does that mean that buildings have no moral obligation? Developers are very often criticised for 'raping' the city, tearing down much-loved 'jewels', all and only for profit and gain. Do we really mean it's ok to savage the environment as long as the design is 'easy on the eye'? I think we do.
Don't agree at all - the things I mentioned were in the past and there's nothing we can do about them, so hating the buildings because of how they were built seems rather churlish.

Attitudes - hopefully - have moved on. Savaging the environment is never excusable.