http://bucf.files.wordpress.com/2008...labour-800.jpg
Printable View
You are still very fat.Quote:
Originally Posted by RonnieW
Ha, why do you say that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Waterways
A draw?? But such a pity the news of the the peace accord, never reached the Brit's/Scots troops, before the battle of New Orleans,where they were decimated by the militia's defending the town,basically because they had no ladders to scale the earthworks/defences!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Waterways
Aye aye,haven't you started your diet!:unibrow:Quote:
Originally Posted by pablo42
I am sure I am one of the few that whilst i did not like ThatcheR she was right for her time we had a mining industry that would not accept it was bust but wanted the country to fund ongoing insolvency ditto British Leyland the mainreason she was re-elected was there was no credible Labour alternative I would also say the reason Blair was re-elected there was no credible Con alternative which brings us to today most of the country wants this government out and Cameron whilst hardly credible is acceptable only because the Brown out is so adamant
. I would also ask this question................ If the expenses malarkey was going on 30 years ago Who do you think would be up before the beak ?
Blair
Thatcher
Callaghan
Heseltine
Healy
Lamont
Churchill
Hume
Heath
add any other names you desire
I had another look at his anarchist party photos and was still fat.Quote:
Originally Posted by pablo42
Ha, don't think he's talking about me. Well, hope not.Quote:
Originally Posted by wsteve55
Not nice though, all the same WW.Quote:
Originally Posted by Waterways
Yes, it's not nice, but completely typical of the ignorant to refer to an 'anarchist party'. How could there ever be an 'anarchist' party except in the uncomprehending mind of inbred simpletons?Quote:
Originally Posted by pablo42
http://deandonaldson.files.wordpress...new_labour.jpg
Don't seem that you two get on too well. Is there a history there?Quote:
Originally Posted by RonnieW
Quote:
Originally Posted by pablo42
There certainly is! I can't stand these supporters of political parties who are out to do away with our civil liberties, who support dangerous nut case regimes (like George Bush for instance) who sell arms to dodgy didctators, who encourage racism, who run down the NHS, run down public transport, close schools and bomb babies in the Third World. You know, Labour Party hacks and others who support the rich. People like Watercloset for example.
Surely WW is against that too?Quote:
Originally Posted by RonnieW
He can't be. He supports the Labour Party. New Labour = Slave Labour!Quote:
Originally Posted by pablo42
Then why does your party have flags then? And many fat people waving them?Quote:
Originally Posted by RonnieW