Originally Posted by
jc_everton
Dr. WW PhD, thanks for the kind advice but it is my aim to come up with a number of proposals that are realistic and to also consider the aims of Merseytravel. It seems as if they are considering reopening the tunnels but not in the way you propose.
On past performance they don't know what they want to do.
If your proposal was so blatently great, I'm sure someone at Merseytravel would have put the case forward by now
They don't know about it.
div>
and if your scheme does ever go ahead then hat's off to you as your proposals would have been mirrorred by rail experts.
You feel my work will not be up to scratch because I do not agree with you!
No. You were losing focus. You were dropping into detail losing focus of what your aims were. You were all over the place. You need to re-focus and get it all back together.
It is my duty to weigh up every argument and look at the pro's and con's. I see pro's in your loop but I also see con's. I have put forward a number of innovative ideas in order to make us look at the bigger picture and consider all available options.
Good so far. Have you prioritised the options to achieve the mains aims?
I could have proposed other innovations but it's pointless because they are, of course... pet fads.
I was going to suggest you apply for a lecturer's job at JMU but lecturers need to be open-minded and instil this into their students. Sadly, you fail in this field.
I have done lecturing. One thing is clear - have main aims (what is it for? What is it to achieve?) . Never lose sight of those. If you do, you fail and wallowing about in irrelevancy. Structure it all - important to convey the message - the best ideas in the world will not be taken seriously if not put across properly.
Bookmarks