YO! Liverpool
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 6 of 38

Thread: LOONY GREENS THREATEN AIRPORT EXPANSION

  1. #1
    Member Urban's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    31
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default LOONY GREENS THREATEN AIRPORT EXPANSION

    It was announced today that enviromentalists are to lodge an objection to John Lennon Airport's 600 million expansion plans.

    The airport wants to expand to create jobs prosperity and security for all Merseysiders but these people are hell bent on stopping the plans.


    ADVERTISING




    These people cannot suceed because the future prosperity of the city depends on these plans and would turn Liverpool into an international city again.

    In fact expansion at JLA is greener than expansion at Manchester which is already at capacity point and is threatening the Cheshire countryside.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Waterways's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,973
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Blog Entries
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Urban View Post
    It was announced today that enviromentalists are to lodge an objection to John Lennon Airport's 600 million expansion plans.

    The airport wants to expand to create jobs prosperity and security for all Merseysiders but these people are hell bent on stopping the plans.

    These people cannot suceed because the future prosperity of the city depends on these plans and would turn Liverpool into an international city again.

    In fact expansion at JLA is greener than expansion at Manchester which is already at capacity point and is threatening the Cheshire countryside.


    The greenies may have a point. The current runway has a flight path right over Hale village - how clever indeed! It could have gone to the right on a causway at both ends so it flys over no one except the river at both ends of the runway. Too easy to think of isn't it. I can see why greenies get pissed off with peope who can only see pound notes.
    Last edited by Waterways; 09-16-2006 at 12:51 PM.
    The new Amsterdam at Liverpool?
    Save Liverpool Docks and Waterways - Click

    Deprived of its unique dockland waters Liverpool
    becomes a Venice without canals, just another city, no
    longer of special interest to anyone, least of all the
    tourist. Would we visit a modernised Venice of filled in
    canals to view its modern museum describing
    how it once was?


    Giving Liverpool a full Metro - CLICK
    Rapid-transit rail: Everton, Liverpool & Arena - CLICK

    Save Royal Iris - Sign Petition

  3. #3
    Member Urban's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    31
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    I don't accept that at all.

    Why is it always Liverpool?

    The heritage lobby, enviromentalists and others who think Liverpool should be ossified as a museum piece should go and sling their hook and toy with another place.

    Liverpool has made reaal progress over the last 10 years but if anything substantial is to be achieved we need a modern 21st Century Airport, a Gatwick to the Manchester Heathrow.

    I repeat it is greener to develop Liverpool than Manchester.

  4. #4
    ANY CAR CAN BE A BANGER ! spenny389's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Speke, Liverpool
    Age
    42
    Posts
    12
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    I live within spitting distance of airport development land and am all for the development, there are lots of people along the road who are objecting but most of the land is just an overgrown waste of space. The once excelent bowling greens and tennis courts have been destroyed years ago and the social club on the old Dunlops playing feild looks ready to colapse anyway, so why not bring improvement and job prospects to an area that for to long has been neglected.
    ITS ONLY TIN AND PAINT SO RACE IT

  5. #5
    Member Urban's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    31
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    i agree with spenny.

    If the airport develops it will produce a rebirth of Speke. It will create hundreds of jobs and the whole area will be regenerated with hotels, shops, landscaping etc.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Waterways's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,973
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Blog Entries
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Urban View Post
    I don't accept that at all.

    Why is it always Liverpool?

    The heritage lobby, enviromentalists and others who think Liverpool should be ossified as a museum piece should go and sling their hook and toy with another place.

    Liverpool has made reaal progress over the last 10 years but if anything substantial is to be achieved we need a modern 21st Century Airport, a Gatwick to the Manchester Heathrow.

    I repeat it is greener to develop Liverpool than Manchester.
    You have missed the point entirely. When it was built the current runway had major opposition, especially from Hale, as it flys right over the village . LOOK AT THE PICTURE. the runway could have gone a few hundred yards to the right with one end on a causeway into the river. It could even be angled to get air traffic from flying over the chemical plants in Widnes/Runcorn. No, no, the *******s wanted to save money and couldn't give a toss about a plane flopping on a chemical plant. One flopped on a factory in 1965 in Halewood. "Well one end flys over the river they said". How pathetic! The runways should be over to the right partially on a causway, then it goes over the river on both ends and not over chemical works or a village. One consultancy advised to put the runway on the river, for future expansion, as at low tide even row boats can't pass at this point.

    Keep the planes away from people as much as possible. It was possible at Liverpool but a few bob they wanted to save. If they can't do it properly then they should not do it at all.

    Long live the Greenies. If they were around in the 1960s then all this crap would not have been built to begin with.
    Last edited by Waterways; 09-16-2006 at 12:58 PM.
    The new Amsterdam at Liverpool?
    Save Liverpool Docks and Waterways - Click

    Deprived of its unique dockland waters Liverpool
    becomes a Venice without canals, just another city, no
    longer of special interest to anyone, least of all the
    tourist. Would we visit a modernised Venice of filled in
    canals to view its modern museum describing
    how it once was?


    Giving Liverpool a full Metro - CLICK
    Rapid-transit rail: Everton, Liverpool & Arena - CLICK

    Save Royal Iris - Sign Petition

Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Airport Location
    By Waterways in forum Liverpool City Suburbs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-31-2008, 04:54 PM
  2. Merseyrail Expansion On North West Tonight News
    By oritelad in forum Liverpool Developments Chat
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-29-2007, 01:15 PM
  3. Speke Airport
    By Kev in forum Liverpool Firsts, Facts and Achievements
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-20-2005, 10:09 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

For daily updates, to support us further or to join in the conversation: Follow us on Twitter @YOLiverpool / Like our Facebook Page: @LiverpoolInPictures / Join the Facebook Group: Liverpool In Pictures (YO! Liverpool)

YO! Liverpool has taken me over 10 years to develop and maintain. If you like the website, please donate via PayPal!