One of the main errors that some historians make is where they over-extrapolate from a source. So a sign/map/church board with the term Toxteth Park on it is heralded as prooving that such a place meaningfully existed or even continues to exist. I don't doubt that Toxteth Park existed as at least a topographical reality in the distant past and that as the city extended its boundaries at the beginning of the last century there may have been maps that showed the location of Toxteth Park and one or two civic or ecclesiastical organisations might have used this terms to denote location but it never amounted to anything durable or meaningful to the actual people who eventually lived in the area that was once part of Toxteth Park in King John's hunting days (modern day L17 in the main).
div>
People on this thread have drawn attention to how churches have used the term Toxteth Park to describe where they are situated but this is far from universal practice. For example, St Michaels (CofE) half way between Dingle Lane and Jericho Lane doesn't use this term nor does St Charles (RC) just over half way between Dingle Lane and Aigburth Vale. No one who lives in this area would ever describe themselves as living in Toxteth or Toxteth Park. This is not because of some form of misplaced snobbery but because the identification since the beginning of the last century has been with L17 the postcode. People say that they are from L17.
Up until the so-called Toxteth Riots most people who lived in what is now termed Toxteth would have described themselves as living in L8. After the riots the term Toxteth has been increasingly used to describe that area in the local media, and by people from outside L8. Everyone I know from L8 describes themselves as coming from L8. I don't know many people who say that they are from Toxteth. However, a lot of agencies to help the local communities have been set up since the riots and these often use the term 'Toxteth'.
As for the term 'Dingle'. My understanding is that this once specified a very specific area around Dingle Lane and extended to the river. It initially contained a few fancy residences and more recently massive tenement blocks of the Gardens variety until they were knocked down. It now seems to extend right up the hill and over it. I don't know what's going on there but maybe districts like cities themselves can alter over time.
In other words you pay your money and you make your own choice! Maybe it's about multiple layers of association? LCC defines an area in one way, and then another. The church might employ another way, and local historians are sometimes caught between the two.
Maybe it's about how people define their local idenity? I noticed how the challenge to find Liverpool's oldest non aristrocratic family defined Liverpool in a particular way (not including Knowsley, Bootle, Kirkby etc.). Does that mean that these places are not part of a place called Liverpool? Or is it just about how you define the city? On this occasion they're not but on another occasion they might be. Maybe this principle of definitions depending on the terms of reference being used extends to Toxteth Park (and everywhere else hereabouts)?
Bookmarks