I agree Its a weird one between the Beatles and the Stones and I like both myself for different reasons. Can't understand the whole 'which one is better?' etc as they are so different. Maybe in the very early days of the bands when they recorded old blues songs etc and then had the poppy tunes you could say they were competing in some way but otherwise they are such different styles of music. The Beatles so went ther own way and all ways while I feel the stones stayed pretty much along the lines of their R'n'B thing (Satanic Majesty era apart) which no one can beat them at.
As for the Beatles as a band, it amazes me when I see these top 10O lps of all time etc things and see Radiohead and Oasis at number 1. They may have recorded good albums but when a band changes the way chart music sounds across the world, rescues America from its depression after Kennedy was shot, then releases something like Riubber Soul, follows that with Revolver, then changes everything again with Sgt Peppers, how can any other band compare.
Having said all that, Im sure some will disagree, which is cool
div>
By the way Chris, The International Beatles week is still going as strong as ever and takes place in the week running up to the Matthew street festival with conventions and auctions etc.
Bookmarks