Thank you for your email. My apologies for not replying sooner, but I have
been working away for nearly a week. I fully understand your concerns, and would like to you to know the full story. The main point is that this is NOT a
plot to get rid of the statues!
A substantial amount of vitriol has been directed at Sefton Planning Committee, and myself in particular over
last week's decision to refuse an extension of the time permitted for the Iron men to stay, at the end of their agreed stay of nearly two years. What
actually went on? Over the past two months I have been contacted by large numbers of local people voicing two main concerns. One, that they would be further
prevented from using the area for recreational water pursuits, for another, unspecified and ultimately moveable length of time. The other was over the safety
aspect of the siting of many of the statues.
Whilst I fully appreciate and wholeheartedly support the cultural and tourism values that the
statues bring, my ultimate priority has to be the concerns and welfare of the people within my constituency who contact me, and whom I have been elected to
serve. I approached the MCA (Maritime and Coastguard Agency) to ask their opinion of whether or not there was a problem. They informed me that they were
div>
seriously worried about several incidents they had attended, and were surprised and disappointed that none of their advice or concerns had been voiced at
planning meetings. Along with other evidence, I read out this section of a letter from the MCA which was sent to Planning, at last week's planning
meeting.
"I would wish to make it absolutely clear that the Maritime and Coastguard Agency does not support the proposal to retain the
Another Place sculptural installation over the long term and ideally would prefer that the statues be removed by the original approval expiry date of 30th
November ’06. The safety concerns are considerable and it is extremely fortunate that the incidents which have occurred since their installation have been
resolved satisfactorily. That said the outcome of two of the incidents could have been more serious, if not fatal, had it not been for the favourable ebb
tide and the speed of the available Search and Rescue Resources."
This speaks for itself. A vote was taken, and I was one of eight
cross-party members (ie from ALL parties) who voted for refusal. I am delighted that that the safety issue has been brought to the fore, and must now be
addressed. It could have been resolved sooner if people had been listened to. The next step should be to look for a way forward, possibly moving the statues
installed in the soft sand and mud flats to further back on the beach where they are safe to view, and do not interfere with other activities. I am amazed
that no-one from Liverpool Biennial, Another Place Ltd, or indeed anyone who wants the statues to stay had not suggested this the first time (months ago)
that the aforementioned concerns were expressed.
I WISH TO PLACE ON RECORD MY PERSONAL ENJOYMENT OF THE ANTHONY GORMLEY ARTWORK, AND STRESS
THAT MY PRIMARY CONCERN HAS BEEN TO HIGHLIGHT THE SIGNIFICANT CONCERNS FROM LARGE NUMBERS OF MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, AND RELEVANT BODIES, REGARDING THE SAFETY
ASPECT OF THE INSTALLATION. IF THE DEBATE SURROUNDING THE DECISION AT THE PLANNING MEETING HAS HIGHLIGHTED THE CONSIDERABLE AND, UNTIL NOW, DISREGARDED
CONCERNS, THEN I FEEL THAT WE HAVE ACHIEVED A BALANCE OVERALL.
.
I FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT EVERY DECISION I TAKE HAS TO BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF
THE CONSTITUENTS WHO HAVE PLACED THEIR TRUST IN ME. MY ROLE AS A COUNCILLOR HAS BEEN VERY MUCH A LIFESTYLE CHOICE, AS OPPOSED TO A CAREER CHOICE, I HAVE
COMMITTED MYSELF TO SERVE THOSE WHO VOTE FOR ME TO THE VERY BEST OF MY ABILITY. BUT, PLEASE LET IT BE REMEMBERED THAT I HAVE TO SERVE THE INTERESTS OF ALL,
EVEN THOSE WHO HAVE SHOWN CONCERN OR DISLIKE FOR THE GORMLEY INSTALLATIONS.
I WELCOME THE LEVEL OF INTEREST THAT THE DECISION AT THE
PLANNING MEETING HAS PROVOKED AND I CAN ONLY HOPE THAT WE CAN NOW ENGAGE IN A LEVEL OF DISCUSSION WHICH SATISFIES THE CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENDA WHILST AT
THE SAME TIME FULFILLS THE HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUES THAT HAVE CAUSED SUCH CONCERN.
I AM AND ALWAYS WILL BE FULLY COMMITTED TO WHAT IS BEST
FOR MY CONSTITUENCY AND FUNDAMENTALLY FOR THOSE PEOPLE WITHIN MY CONSTITUENCY.
Bookmarks