
Originally Posted by
Waterways
The iron frames of three churches were early 1800s, so the forge on the foreshore in the 1835 map would have made those.
I think you're right. I've also revised & re-posted the map [on post#44] showing the 'forge', as I found a few errors on the Jonathan Bennison map of 1835. The angle of streets [crossing each other] were way out, when I laid the more accurate 1906 OS version over it. Problem fixed now.
div>

Originally Posted by
Waterways
The Forge moved back inland, and expanded greatly, after the docks took the foreshore. Harrington Dock opened in 1844...
The pottery site closed in 1840, so four years to excavate and construct the new Harrington Dock? Does this sound feasible to you?

Originally Posted by
Waterways
Did the Pottery close because of dock expansion rather than business reasons? Early versions of CPO's? Or a combination of both? It was on the site of an old copper works.
Peter Hyland gives the answer in his book,
The Herculaneum Pottery. Whilst acknowledging that Wedgewood is often cited as the 'reason' behind the failure of The Herculaneum Pottery. He points out that Wedgewood were well established by the 1760's, well before Herculaneum came on the scene in 1796. So, they would have known the score from the beginning of the venture. By 1836 '51,000 tonnes of earthenware and china were sent to the Liverpool docks from the Staffordshire potteries.'
The main reason PH gives is two-fold. Firstly, the collapsing market and taste for blue transfer-printed ware had virtual dissappeared by 1840. Other potteries, in direct competition with Herculaneum, had also ceased trading by this time, 'victims of changing tastes and the need for more efficient production methods.
Secondly, and perhaps the main reason, was that two private Acts were passed in parliament in 1840, and 1846 for the development of Herculaneum Dock. PH further says that 'in any case, the Herculaneum Dock as eventually completed did not occupy any part of the pottery site, being a few hundred yards up the river in an area formally known as pottery beach.'
The site previously, as you mentioned, was a copper-smelting works, est. 1767 by Charles Roe & Co, a firm based in Macclesfield.
Bookmarks