True - but that is a judgement on what was there before, not what is there now. Nearly all new buildings are an improvement on the dereliction or datedness of what they happen to replace. Now you mention it - it does look kind of dated already. I could imagine it having been built on the campus of one of the new universities in the sixties.
Take your point,but it's just that when anything new comes along in Liverpool,people start going on about how great it used to be!( in thier imagination) Dont forget,the Liver buildings got ****ged off,good style,by some when it first went up!
p.s. some quick examples of how good it used to look.....a giant toilet comes to mind!
Last edited by wsteve55; 09-03-2009 at 03:06 PM.
I have mixed feelings towards the new Mersey Ferries Terminal. At first I disliked it intensely, but having been inside my attitude has warmed a little.
HOWEVER, I really do think this building would have been more suited to have been a joint Mersey Ferries and Isle of Man Steam Packet terminal located at the north end of the Pier Head piazza.
Only in Liverpool could we have a semi international terminal constructed of portacabins whilst the terminal for a 45 minute ferry trip is a substantiual multimillion pound construction. There should have been some joined up thinking between Liverpool City Council, Peel Ports and the Isle of Man Steam Packet.
Some weeks ago I went into the new cafe-bar for a coffee. The large coffee cost around ?2.75. Just over a week ago I had a similar large coffee in St. Peter Port, Guernsey and it only cost ?1.60 in a cafe offering a superior sea view!
Why does it cost ?1.15 more in Liverpool when Guernsey is considered to be an area of considerable affluence?
John
September 5, 2009
The Carbuncle Cup: The award for ugliest building goers to...
Tom Dyckhoff applauds the prize that no architect wants to win ? the Carbuncle Cup
"When an architect has done something truly awful, they deserve to be kicked.? Amanda Baillieu, the august editor of the architectural newspaper Building Design, is not known for mincing her words. Faced with a building as eyewateringly dreary as Liverpool?s Pier Head Ferry Terminal, though, words fail her: ?It?s just dross. Look at it. It?s ... agh!?
Belfast-based Hamilton Architects, hang your heads in shame, for you have just won 2009?s Carbuncle Cup. ?We set up the cup four years ago,? says Baillieu, ?as a kind of anti-Stirling Prize. Architects constantly garland themselves with awards. They?re tripping over them. But when you see what?s being built all over the country, you have to think, hold on a minute.? The cup has become to next month?s Stirling Prize what the Razzies, or Golden Raspberries, are to the Oscars, a moment to pr!ck the ego of a profession not known for its shrinking violets. Fellow architects nominate their brethren whose work has not quite come up to the standards of, say, Bob the Builder.
One of this year?s judges, Sean Griffiths, from architects FAT, says Liverpool?s ferry terminal won not just for its derivative design, though this is bad enough: ?Third-rate Zaha Hadid, a crude, jazzy-angled lump of crap, a terrible example of an architecturally illiterate client trying to be groovy and getting it so, so wrong, like a 50-year-old making a fashion faux pas in a disco.?
What makes it worse, he says, is where the thing is, slap-bang on Liverpool?s waterfront, a Unesco World Heritage Site, beside the city?s Three Graces. ?It literally is a monstrous carbuncle on the face of an old friend,? he says, with a knowing nod to the Prince of Wales?s infamous quip. ?And it?s now the gateway to my home city.?
Both the architect and Mersey Travel, which commissioned the building, inevitably feel not the slightest hint of shame. ?We?re proud of it,? says a spokesman for Hamilton Architects. Us too, says another from Mersey Travel, adding: ?We?re not desperately interested in the opinions of two journalists and an architect, to be honest.?
And therein lies the problem. Because the terminal building represents one of two trends that have come to dominate British architecture. They think they got an icon, says Baillieu. Indeed they do. ?With Mersey Travel we?ve jointly faced up to the challenge of designing an iconic building,? says Hamilton Architects, ?one that?s vibrant and multi-use, and the nucleus of the new Pier Head Plaza, drawing the public to a formerly barren public space. It?s in a location that can be viewed from all sides, so it?s been conceived as a strong sculptural form.?
Baillieu says: ?There are too many architects out there doing funny shapes and wonky windows. Truth is, only a handful are skilful enough to do it well.? The crap icon is, alas, now an all-too common sight in our cities, designed by an architect who thinks they?re the next Frank Gehry, for some client who wants the next headline-grabber. Well Liverpool sure got headlines.
The second trend? The ?awful drabness of buildings built under the Private Finance Initiative (PFI)?, says Baillieu, like so many of the new schools and hospitals up and down the country ? or the two university buildings in Nottingham and Edinburgh that came second and third in the cup.
Indeed, so bad and so numerous has bad British architecture become that it has got its own blog ? badbritisharchitecture.blogspot.com ? whose mission statement is ?I hate the b@stards who make these buildings. So here I am, taking the p!ss out of them.?
What unites both the crap icon and PFI drabness are the same underlying causes: a lack of cash and a lack of care. We?ve just been through a 15-year building boom. The country is awash with new office towers, buy-to-let apartment blocks, health centres and shopping malls that will be with us for generations. Most have been built by clients who may have good intentions ? such as regeneration ? but who are willing to stump up the money and expertise you need to get real quality. ?How do these buildings slip past?? asks Baillieu. Simple.
Planning, like so much local democracy in this country, is knackered. Local council planning departments are so cash-strapped and overworked that they have no time for architectural expertise or proper, proactive consultation with us lot. And the result? Well, see for yourself at bdonline.co.uk. And weep.
Source: Times Online
Dont care,still think it looks great!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think Amanda Baillieu is spot on when she says that "There are too many architects out there doing funny shapes and wonky windows. Truth is, only a handful are skilful enough to do it well."
Unfortunately Hamilton Architects weren't one of them!
No need - just compare it with the new Museum of Liverpool building a few yards away.
div>
They probably would. I bet they think it looks stunning. Look at some of the other ones they've done
http://www.hamiltonarchitects.co.uk/projects_1.html
At least ours only cost 10 million
Some old Liverpool pics I found
My Flickr Pics
Latest Additions:
Wolfmother @ O2 Academy
Spin Doctors @ O2 Academy 2
Sefton Park
Liverpool Cathedral Tower Experience and St Georges Hall
Chester Zoo
Wirral Egg Run 2011
Check out the Yo! Liverpool Flickr Group
10 million quid just for a waiting room for ferry crossing punters...sheeeesh! Liverpool council seriously needs investigating.
And I don't believe Gladstone Conservatory cost the same to revamp either.
Bookmarks