I just saw the following in the latest minutes of the council 3 parks committee meeting.
Motion by Councillor John Coyne –
This Committee considers that Lark Lane has become saturated with licensed premises which are at such a concentration as to create a public nuisance and impact on crime and disorder.
This Committee notes that section 10 of the Liverpool City Council Licensing Policy Statement, 7 January 2005, allows for the creation of a special licensing policy for a local area which suffers from too high a density of licensed premises.
This Committee requests Licensing Officers to prepare a case for a special licensing policy to protect the area of Lark Lane.
_____
div>
Amendment by Councillor Paul Clein, duly seconded
That the Motion be approved with the addition of another paragraph requesting the Licensing Officers to liaise with Merseyside Police to see if there is a basis for a Cumulative Impact Policy.
During the course of the debate the first Amendment was accepted and became the Substantive Motion.
_____
Second Amendment by Councillor Peter Allen, duly seconded
That the Substantive Motion be approved with the addition of Licensing Officers contacting Councillor Elaine Allen with regard to current work she has undertaken regarding this issue.
During the course of the debate the second Amendment was accepted and became the Substantive Motion and was resolved accordingly.
Bookmarks