
Originally Posted by
PhilipG
I don't see why houses can't be built on part of the site.
It was always part of the original plan.
In fact, houses have already been built, and it's precisely those tenants who are now saying "Not In My Back Yard".
div>
It should be remembered that we only have Prince's, Sefton and Newsham Parks because the perimeters were sold for housing to raise the cash for the laying out of those parks.
I'm fed up with the build new houses obsession and that area has enough people living there. What about all the empty houses over Liverpool? Why can't thay be fixed up instead of being left for photographers to make a collection titled "urban decay"?
Bookmarks