Originally Posted by
petromax
Just picking up on this one point to refute (of many possible candidates ); what leads you to think that anyone outside of Utopia is going to drop their primeaval territorial instincts and selflessly act for the greater good?
Few will, that is why we have governments.
To allude to another which appears similarly myopic; if anyone might build wherever anyone wanted 'within reason' (whatever that might mean),
Not in National Parks, near nuclear power stations, etc.
what effect due you think that this unbridled urban sprawl would have an our collective carbon footprint?
As only 7.5% of the land mass is settled, we can't "sprawl" anywhere. There is just too much land in the country, to use the emotive propaganda word, "sprawl" onto.
It would help considerably if you could distill the no-doubt cogent arguments in the accompanying links to screeds of closely type argument into a few sentences for all our benefit
What I put forwards was simple to understand:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/watercity/LandArticle.html
div>
We all have lots to gain - even you.
Bookmarks