Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 57

Thread: Au revoir The Lamb

  1. #31
    Cadfael
    Guest Cadfael's Avatar

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ged View Post
    Ainscough's Liverpool book has pics he took throughout the 60s, mainly 66/67. Nearly all contain people and it enhances them because you see the fashions and hairstyles too and gives a sense of time as do the motor vehicles in the photos, Joe Devine does this too, it's part of the attraction. I think it can be a bit drab and a loss to just photograph a building with nothing else in shot but it's a trap I fall into sometimes.
    That's one thing I love getting, a building with a car in front.


  2. #32
    PhilipG
    Guest PhilipG's Avatar

    Default

    The Child Protection Act was quoted to me, and it was obvious the Stewards in St John's Gardens were under instructions, because I was challenged a number of times.
    However, the point I was making in this thread was that somebody's image doesn't belong to them.
    That is obvious when you see reporters in crowded streets, and you can see the faces of all the other people.

  3. #33
    Re-member Ged's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Here, there & everywhere.
    Posts
    7,197

    Default

    If I was taking a photo of the Steble fountain on a lovely summers day (ok, I know that's hardly likely for a start) and kids were playing in it cos it was on, then i'd see that as an action shot which would enhance it (rather like one that appeared on the photo of the day of a kid running through the Williamson square water feature) Unless one of their parents or guardians objected then i'd tell anyone else to take a running jump, it's not as if you're illegally venturing into the swimming baths or changing rooms with one is it - you're out in broad daylight in the fresh air on a public street for goodness sake.
    www.inacityliving.piczo.com/

    Updated weekly with old and new pics.

  4. #34
    Cadfael
    Guest Cadfael's Avatar

    Default

    I think the question here is : Would you like some stranger coming up to your child and taking a photo?

    It's a funny old world and its getting worse. When I was in the Boys Brigade, there was hundreds of people taking pictures as we walked past, now camera's are banned there!!

  5. #35
    Re-member Ged's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Here, there & everywhere.
    Posts
    7,197

    Default

    I can sympathise with that. If it's a bang on 'Here kiddy, stand there while I take a photo of you' then I see what people mean but then again Bernard Fallon didn't have those worries back in the 60s and one of his most iconic pictures that he used for his long way home exhibition poster was of 3 kids stood outside a Scottie road pub. Innocent times back then when I bet there was just as many paedos but just not the media glare.
    www.inacityliving.piczo.com/

    Updated weekly with old and new pics.

  6. #36
    Cadfael
    Guest Cadfael's Avatar

    Default

    I remember when Boots kicked off at someone and called the police purely because the PARENTS took a picture of their kids in their own bath.

    We've lots of pictures of us kids running around the garden without a stitch or the first time in the bath!!

  7. #37
    PhilipG
    Guest PhilipG's Avatar

    Default

    This was taken in April.
    When the world of photography seemed not so fraught with dangers.


  8. #38

    Default

    I see nothing wrong with the above picture. Anyway some people only need the simplest of excuses to control people.
    Currently Ignoring:
    The Door Bell
    The voices in my head


  9. #39
    Senior Member steveb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    445

    Default

    Crazy... 99% of the time it is inevitable that you get a person in
    any pic,s you take. I have said it before what about TV and press
    photog,s ?, their pic,s are seen by millions. It is also the fact that
    men are treated different to women when taking pic,s, discrimination
    or what... I try not to include any people in my shots but sometimes
    like the 800th parade you have no choice.

  10. #40
    Senior Member marie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wavertree
    Age
    44
    Posts
    233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by steveb View Post
    Crazy... 99% of the time it is inevitable that you get a person in
    any pic,s you take. I have said it before what about TV and press
    photog,s ?, their pic,s are seen by millions. It is also the fact that
    men are treated different to women when taking pic,s, discrimination
    or what... I try not to include any people in my shots but sometimes
    like the 800th parade you have no choice.
    And u think the same if is a police or a children?

  11. #41
    Re-member Ged's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Here, there & everywhere.
    Posts
    7,197

    Default

    If police or children are in a public place and not a private place and are not the focal subject - then yes.
    www.inacityliving.piczo.com/

    Updated weekly with old and new pics.

  12. #42
    Senior Member marie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wavertree
    Age
    44
    Posts
    233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ged View Post
    If police or children are in a public place and not a private place and are not the focal subject - then yes.
    I am not speakin' about the law, I am speakin' about the moral and the safe...
    I respect ur opinion, but for the security of a children or a police, I never put up a photo about them in a web site.

  13. #43
    Otterspool Onomatopoeia Max's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Nowhere
    Age
    38
    Posts
    1,908

    Default

    Heres Info on Photographers rights.

    http://www.sirimo.co.uk/media/UKPhotographersRights.pdf
    Gididi Gididi Goo.

  14. #44
    Senior Member lindylou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,677

    Default

    Of course, there are occasions when you can't avoid taking pictures of people, ie; parades or busy public places.

    Some people can be very touchy though and not want their face to be on the internet.
    It depends on the circumstances I suppose.

    Some time ago on a holiday forum, I posted a link to my Webshots of some holiday snaps; the pics included one of a fellow forum member who we'd met up with at the time. He pm'd me to ask me to remove the one of him.
    His reason being that he was a policeman and didn't want his picture being on the internet. (Webshots being too public).
    It was ok though to post the pics on the forum which was private to members only.

    I hadn't given it a thought then about Webshots being open to the world - but I am more careful now.

  15. #45
    Otterspool Onomatopoeia Max's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Nowhere
    Age
    38
    Posts
    1,908

    Default

    I just Ignore touchy people as much as I can now, unless their a police person.

    I hate communication.
    Gididi Gididi Goo.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •