As I have said before, the story was already written, it was in the records of UK, France, Germany and the US.
The story was again already written by the reports from the survivors over many years in various publications.
All Bleasdale had to do was to join the Official to the Personal and Voala, he has a story.
But he has to go and write some ficticious `story` about seafaring men, He has no idea about seafaring men.
I think Mr Bleasdale owes a great big appology to all Seafarers, what he wrote was certainly an insult to the integrity of Seafarers.
The way he portrays them was diabolical. They were shown as whimps and thieves, Did he have any evidence that a wine steward stole the money from the Casino???? Did he have any evidence that a Junior Third Officer was baby sitting a lady passengers baby, while she went to a dance, instead of being on watch in a war zone.? Did he have any evidence that a Junior Third Officer went into a passengers empty cabin and was caught rooting through her personal effects ?
What an insult to brave men who went to sea in those ships risking their lives to save the country, what a way to portray them.
40 TO 45,000 Merchant Seamen were killed at sea during the war and this is the way that Bleasdale portrays them, Diabolical
HE SHOULD BE MADE TO STAND UP IN FRONT OF A TV CAMERA AND MAKE A BIG APPOLOGY TO THE MERCHANT NAVY. Then arrest the man for slander. I hate Bleasdale for what he has done.
div>
Bookmarks