Not the first ? What ? I was pulled up on my spelling then for some weird reason Norris Green was mentioned and then...ohhh forget it. The poor fella lost the plot!!!
Printable View
Not the first ? What ? I was pulled up on my spelling then for some weird reason Norris Green was mentioned and then...ohhh forget it. The poor fella lost the plot!!!
Kev, will u lock this thread. It's going nowhere and is getting beyond pathetic
Hey Scouse, I was just starting to enjoy it. Gonna tell of me tales of shooting tigers and pandas.Quote:
Originally Posted by scouse smurf
lol, start a new thread called Pablo's stories :)Quote:
Originally Posted by pablo42
I'd get locked up for half of them. I've been asked to write a book about me adventures, but can't remember most of them. Too much alcohol during me travels. I rely on other people telling me what I done.Quote:
Originally Posted by scouse smurf
There's a bit of dispute over Koreans nuclear test. The signature of the device is very different to a nuclear expolsion. The clever money is on it being a massive conventional device. This brinkmanship has been used in the past.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diane Louise
The three biggest effects of nuclear explosions/ accidents have proved localised. Hiroshima and Nagasaki these were inhabited straight away, mainly through ignorance, and Chernobyl. Chernobyl is proving that nature can clean up an area pretty fast. It is still hazardous to humans, but the wildlife is showing a remarkable recovery.
Russian estimates of 50, to 200, years, before humans would be safe to live in the area,are generally agreed,and though wildlife does seem to have recovered,they are still exposed to high levels of radiation,which must have an effect,surely!?Quote:
Originally Posted by pablo42
It would appear that the wildlife is thriving. Dunno about the long term effects. Take a look at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.Quote:
Originally Posted by wsteve55
What no elephants ? Lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by pablo42
Just a reminder :PDT_Piratz_26:Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsaZappathing
I could tell you stories of elephant poachers that I came across. Seen some dreadful elephant deaths. They are almost human when it comes to grieving. Quite strange.Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsaZappathing
Ha, not much of a hippy now Zap...Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsaZappathing
Ha,H,we've had a right good laugh over the last few days,thanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsaZappathing
Slightly different victims,but,apparently,Liverpool is one of,if not the worst place in the country,for dog fighting! Draw your own conclusions!:disgust:
Ha H ?Quote:
Originally Posted by wsteve55
Who's "we" ? Not me !!!
Glad you thanked me for the info though. Your welcome :PDT11
Maybe now you'll think before you type:PDT_Xtremez_42:
I believe so, over here there have been dog thefts of Staffordshire Bulls. People reckon these are stolen for training the fighting dogs. Disgusting people, who do such things.Quote:
Originally Posted by wsteve55
You're right regarding the contradiction by foxhunters - but the ironic thing is an extremely high number of foxes are killed by vehicles...It has nothing to do with pest control. There are many rural people who abhor foxhunting. It is a complete myth to suggest it is a 'town v country' thing. This is a smokescreen for a desperate group who are scraping the barrel.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ged
Ah yes Ged, the unseated jockey argument...It is a horses instinct to run - it could be argued that they have had it driven into them. I tend to look at the fact that when you travel through the countryside, how many horses do you see 'running?' None whatsoever...They have been driven to it by us humans in the name of warfare and so-called sport. Admittedly, I'm sure the majority of people like your good self who watch and bet on horse racing don't want to see the animal dead unlike foxhunting.
As this thread is about fox-hunting, and foxhunting is BANNED there should be no more debate about it...;)
Genie?en... :)
http://www.keepcrueltyhistory.com/
HAPPY HUNTING, NOT !!!!!
I think if you don't like fox hunting, might I suggest that you don't go to one.
I don't go to them. But they are outlawed and anybody who does take part in one is a criminal.Quote:
Originally Posted by pablo42
I don't think this law is being enforced though is it. To be honest, don't get too many of 'em in Wallasey.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark R
You're not wrong there Pablo...Clarissa Dickson-Wright and Sir Mark Prescott pleaded guilty to hare coursing fairly recently and walked out of court...Quote:
Originally Posted by pablo42
I don't really agree with Hare Coursing, reckon that's why I don't go. What do they do with the dead hares. Spose there wouldn't be much left of 'em.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark R
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark R
yes, you'd never see horses scrambling to clear ridiculously high jumps like those in the G. National. They wouldn't do that instinctively for fun !
yeah, I've gone right off her :disgust:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark R
Mark R.... Sorry but I love to hunt.
It's hunting season now...Yippee!!
Hare coursing is good. Most of the hares escape.
As for hunting foxes....I'm all for that and I like most country sports.
You can be an animal lover and hunt.
Sorry Zappa, I have to ask...Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsaZappathing
That's not an intended spelling mistake is it :ninja:
And hunt Mart:PDT_Xtremez_42: not and A hunt:eek:
Isn't that known as schizophrenia!!!!
Who said that ?Quote:
Originally Posted by wsteve55
another species to add to ur list, Zappa
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...gulations.html
If that's the case then so be it. Why not ? Because they have colours and look p p pretty (polly) ?
I had some Parrakeet type birds living by me. Nightmare. The noise is bad.
There was talk of shooting the European Eagle owls we have here because they're munching on hedgehogs and other birds of prey.
I would hate them being shot but conservation is conservation. Could I do it. Yes, if there was a need.
:handclap::handclap:Quote:
Originally Posted by hmtmaj
Sorry - you're wrong. that is a contradiction I'm afraid. You might like some animal species but it doesn't make you an animal lover:PDT_Xtremez_42:Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsaZappathing
I am against the blood sport killing of defenceless animals as much as the next decent man but the next time you see all those lovely sheep on the hills or cows mulling around a field, or even horses in the paddock. Remember they are only there and being bred for one thing or they'd be extinct altogether. Food or Sport.
I can gladly say Ged that it won't be because of me :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ged
So then, they would become extinct anyway so no thread ;)
No sorry needed as you are wrong (again). And don't be afraid, I wont bite :unibrow:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark R
I like all animal species and find the majority of them interesting. That goes for rats,squirrels and magpies. However,because I hunt a certain animal which by law is legal to hunt then that doesn't mean I don't like the animal.
If magpies where to become rare then I would try and help increase the species.
I have owned many stuffed animals including,foxes,owls,birds of prey,kayman,badger,red squirrel and a 9ft brown bear. All of which were very old or had papers for proof from DEFRA.:PDT11
I would never buy any new stuffed animals. The reason- you don't know if they where killed legally and if they where stuffed legally.:PDT10
I have to agree to a point Ged,but as I said,quite early on,what a sad indictment on us,if that's, all, they're here for?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ged
Horses that race are bred for racing,horses that jump are bred for jumping.Quote:
Originally Posted by wsteve55
No problem !!:PDT10