Thanks for being little more concise in your post, I'll be even briefer.
1. I wasn't aware that I was attacking anything, Peter. Anyway, I'm back on the tag now.
2. I've asked questions and got some answers, more than I could imagine.. I think you misunderstand my
"empty vessels make the most sound" reference completely. (?)
3.
Your thread is called " Housing Mistakes" isn't it? I followed it to the posts where you started the rant about unpoliceable areas ~ TV's being thrown from high rise flats etc. You revealed yourself in your true colours- a twopence ha'penny sno* with dangerous ideas. I bother to reply because your ideas bother me.
PROBABLY PETER WILL DISMISS HIS AS ENVIOUS!!!!!!!
It's gone from kick the can to pass the buck in Peter's thread.
Going for my tea,
Back again with another question. What is the real purpose of architects? Money crops up so many times in the posts. Please don't go back to the obeying rules and regulations speel, indicating others in badly designed housing.
(re. Radcliffe. I think the family I knew were rehoused qute locally. Radcliffe was a disgrace. If it was a result of cutting costs Liverpool taxpayers paid for it eventually. The speculaters and carpet baggers are at it again.
PEEL HOLDINGS SPOKESMAN SAYS HE'LL WALK IF THERE'S A PUBLIC INQUIRY. F*CK HIM says Chas)
All along the watchtower,
Chas
Bookmarks