Are these the ones?
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445895
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445904
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445907
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445908
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445912
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445914
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445919
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445925
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445926
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445927
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445930
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445932
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445934
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445936
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445939
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445941
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445942
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445944
and my personnal favourite.....
http://www.scienceandsociety.co.uk/r...image=10445923
Regards
Mike
Cracking pics, some of them were in an artical by John C Hughes in Backtrack mag
div>
Aye they are, but I've got massive 6mb images so they've been scanned at source from something!
Bookmarks