Originally Posted by
ChrisGeorge
Hi AZ
The proposed Lutyens cathedral was due to be built on the grand scale very much like the
Westminster Cathedral in London, which itself was based on ancient models as the website for that important London R.C. church shows. I do think there is a case to be made that the feeling was something should be built to rival the scale of the Anglican Cathedral, especially since Liverpool had such a large Catholic population, it only made sense to do so.
div>
....
Chris
I think the intent was more than to "rival the scale" the Anglican cathedral. It would have been ginourmous...
The cathedral, seat of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Liverpool, would have been a massive 530 ft long, larger than any other cathedral in England. The ceiling of the nave would reach 138 ft from the floor, while a great dome, 168 ft in diameter and 300 ft high would crown the church. Aside from the high altar, which would be twelve feet above the floor of the nave, fifty-three side altars would be located down the nave, along the aisles, and in the transepts and apse. The cathedral’s dome would have been larger than St. Peter’s. The entrance arch on the west portal would have been able to contain the tower of Liverpool University. At 520 ft, the cathedral’s height would overpower the nearby Anglican cathedral, itself 330 ft tall. Somewhat ironically, the design of Liverpool’s Catholic cathedral was by Lutyens, an Anglican, while the modern gothic of the city’s contemporary Anglican cathedral, was designed by Gilbert Scott, a Catholic.
Look at the heights mentioned and consider the "visual mass" of both cathederals. Talk about overwhelming.
from here -
http://www.andrewcusack.com/2007/01/...g-never-built/
I scaled two pictures so you can see the "visual mass" of the buildings...
Bookmarks