View Poll Results: Should Liverpool build 'L.A.' type Skyscrapers?

Voters
29. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    14 48.28%
  • No

    15 51.72%
Page 5 of 16 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 227

Thread: Should Liverpool build 'L.A.' type Skyscrapers?

  1. #61
    Newbie IllmaticScouser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Everton, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Posts
    4

    Default

    whatever happened to good architecture
    "If you don't move your head the othe guy will move it for you" - Cus D'Amato

  2. #62
    Senior Member Waterways's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,924
    Blog Entries
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IllmaticScouser View Post
    whatever happened to good architecture
    Open your eyes. Beetham West. the stainless Alexandra Tower, The Wedges, Unity 1 and 2, the new Museum. Even the unique Capital Building, which needs a colourful re-clad to become world-renowned. In London the Ghurkin, etc

    The new Amsterdam at Liverpool?
    Save Liverpool Docks and Waterways - Click

    Deprived of its unique dockland waters Liverpool
    becomes a Venice without canals, just another city, no
    longer of special interest to anyone, least of all the
    tourist. Would we visit a modernised Venice of filled in
    canals to view its modern museum describing
    how it once was?


    Giving Liverpool a full Metro - CLICK
    Rapid-transit rail: Everton, Liverpool & Arena - CLICK

    Save Royal Iris - Sign Petition

  3. #63
    Senior Member Waterways's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,924
    Blog Entries
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spike View Post
    I hate glass, its ugly.
    I love it. Liverpool built the world first metal framed glass curtain walled building - 1864. It is of the city - it is ours.

    The new Amsterdam at Liverpool?
    Save Liverpool Docks and Waterways - Click

    Deprived of its unique dockland waters Liverpool
    becomes a Venice without canals, just another city, no
    longer of special interest to anyone, least of all the
    tourist. Would we visit a modernised Venice of filled in
    canals to view its modern museum describing
    how it once was?


    Giving Liverpool a full Metro - CLICK
    Rapid-transit rail: Everton, Liverpool & Arena - CLICK

    Save Royal Iris - Sign Petition

  4. #64

    Default

    Its still ugly.

    We need better buildings than this rubbish that is going up.
    BE NICE......................OR ELSE

  5. #65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IllmaticScouser View Post
    whatever happened to good architecture
    I agree mate. Some real shockers getting built now, pig ugly.

    BE NICE......................OR ELSE

  6. #66
    Otterspool Onomatopoeia Max's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Nowhere
    Age
    38
    Posts
    1,908

    Default

    I like Beetham West. Don't like the sandbox, the Echo or the Unity though.
    Gididi Gididi Goo.

  7. #67
    Senior Member wsteve55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Crosby
    Posts
    2,199

    Default

    I think the mix of old,and new, look great! Many people from outside the city,that I've met on my travels,think so too! Some "ex-pat's" are sad that we've lost buildings like the sailors home,etc,but think the city appears more dynamic, with the new architecture! I must admit,when the "Cloud" was first suggested,I was horrified,but gave the idea some thought! I considered that it was, the 21st century,and also that other "classic" buildings like the "Liver" building,were criticised,in their time,and decided that if you're going to do it,go for it,....then it was scrapped!

  8. #68
    Senior Member lindylou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,677

    Default

    That's what I like about our new buildings - they make Liverpool dynamic as you say.

    The new museum I won't judge too much yet until I've been inside to see it. I have a feeling it will be fab inside and the views overlooking the river and waterfront will be great.

    The black buildings are going to be real smart too. I like the wedge looking like a huge liner.

  9. #69

    Default

    I dont think it looks Dynamic? Pig Ugly Yes
    BE NICE......................OR ELSE

  10. #70
    Senior Member Waterways's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,924
    Blog Entries
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lindylou View Post
    That's what I like about our new buildings - they make Liverpool dynamic as you say.
    Spot on the pair of you. Outsiders are impressed. The Shanghai Tower, if and when built at Central Docks, should really add some height and quality. We need a big slam them type of building.The tallest in Europe. One which is world renowned.

    The new Amsterdam at Liverpool?
    Save Liverpool Docks and Waterways - Click

    Deprived of its unique dockland waters Liverpool
    becomes a Venice without canals, just another city, no
    longer of special interest to anyone, least of all the
    tourist. Would we visit a modernised Venice of filled in
    canals to view its modern museum describing
    how it once was?


    Giving Liverpool a full Metro - CLICK
    Rapid-transit rail: Everton, Liverpool & Arena - CLICK

    Save Royal Iris - Sign Petition

  11. #71
    Senior Member lindylou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spike View Post
    I dont think it looks Dynamic? Pig Ugly Yes
    Spike, they're not that bad !!

    I think something like St Johns precinct is ugly.

  12. #72
    Senior Member Waterways's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,924
    Blog Entries
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lindylou View Post
    I think something like St Johns precinct is ugly.
    Without doubt.

    The new Amsterdam at Liverpool?
    Save Liverpool Docks and Waterways - Click

    Deprived of its unique dockland waters Liverpool
    becomes a Venice without canals, just another city, no
    longer of special interest to anyone, least of all the
    tourist. Would we visit a modernised Venice of filled in
    canals to view its modern museum describing
    how it once was?


    Giving Liverpool a full Metro - CLICK
    Rapid-transit rail: Everton, Liverpool & Arena - CLICK

    Save Royal Iris - Sign Petition

  13. #73

    Default

    We need a bomb to blow up a few of those ugly buildings that ruin the skyline.
    BE NICE......................OR ELSE

  14. #74
    Senior Member wsteve55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Crosby
    Posts
    2,199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lindylou View Post
    Spike, they're not that bad !!

    I think something like St Johns precinct is ugly.
    Or the "Royal"hospital!!!

  15. #75

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lindylou View Post
    Spike, they're not that bad !!

    I think something like St Johns precinct is ugly.
    St Johns is ugly I agree, So is the Royal.

    I dont see how cramming the waterfront with silly looking towers is making it look better? The Cathedrals are in danger of being blocked. Heading into town the views of the River are already restricted by these silly looking buildings that look like the Transformer toys the kids have.

    They are building way to much and are blocking some great views. The fantastic view from the Albert Dock across to the three grace's is now blocked by a lump of rubbishAttachment 16147Attachment 16148Attachment 16149 It is shameful.
    BE NICE......................OR ELSE

Page 5 of 16 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Why didn't they just build this one?
    By Max in forum Liverpool Developments Chat
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 11-06-2006, 11:09 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •