View Poll Results: Should Liverpool build 'L.A.' type Skyscrapers?

Voters
29. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    14 48.28%
  • No

    15 51.72%
Page 11 of 16 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 227

Thread: Should Liverpool build 'L.A.' type Skyscrapers?

  1. #151
    Senior Member lindylou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,677

    Default

    Good post NL and food for thought.

  2. #152
    Senior Member Waterways's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,924
    Blog Entries
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lindylou View Post
    Good post NL and food for thought.
    Lindy, keep all the old for sure and extend on it, the city is still a commercial city and needs offices and accommodation to suit.

    There is nothing wrong having a quality cluster of tall buildings on the north and south end waterfronts. No more Arenas on the quays that are bland, out of character and even have cars parks on the quays as well. The Albert Dock model clearly needs emulating on most quays as it works and will bring people to the docks waters with amenities to suit. The great thing about height is that it increases population density quite quickly. The odd very tall buildings among a collection of low-rises in the quays would be nice.


    The new Amsterdam at Liverpool?
    Save Liverpool Docks and Waterways - Click

    Deprived of its unique dockland waters Liverpool
    becomes a Venice without canals, just another city, no
    longer of special interest to anyone, least of all the
    tourist. Would we visit a modernised Venice of filled in
    canals to view its modern museum describing
    how it once was?


    Giving Liverpool a full Metro - CLICK
    Rapid-transit rail: Everton, Liverpool & Arena - CLICK

    Save Royal Iris - Sign Petition

  3. #153

    Default

    The Odd tall build.....ODD being the word. They look silly next to our fantastic buildings. And as Gregs dad pointed out the one we have is not even nearly full.
    BE NICE......................OR ELSE

  4. #154
    Senior Member Waterways's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,924
    Blog Entries
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spike View Post
    The Odd tall build.....ODD being the word. They look silly next to our fantastic buildings. And as Gregs dad pointed out the one we have is not even nearly full.
    It will be full, once the Credit Crunch has gone. The city is short of homes, especially quality homes, which you have been informed of but chose to ignore. Or we could have scruffy waste ground with cars parked on it. I prefer a smart modern building.

    The odder the tall building the better.

    The new Amsterdam at Liverpool?
    Save Liverpool Docks and Waterways - Click

    Deprived of its unique dockland waters Liverpool
    becomes a Venice without canals, just another city, no
    longer of special interest to anyone, least of all the
    tourist. Would we visit a modernised Venice of filled in
    canals to view its modern museum describing
    how it once was?


    Giving Liverpool a full Metro - CLICK
    Rapid-transit rail: Everton, Liverpool & Arena - CLICK

    Save Royal Iris - Sign Petition

  5. #155

    Default

    The city is building homes, or do you choose to ignore that? look along Kensington homes are springing up. other areas are starting the process.

    What family would want to live in a tower block in the city???? where do the kids play. Then again who could aford one? not many of Liverpool's working people.

    Though the biggest point is that they are pig ugly.
    BE NICE......................OR ELSE

  6. #156

    Default

    Why waste ground? We could build other things. Not only towers can be built on waste ground.
    BE NICE......................OR ELSE

  7. #157
    Senior Member lindylou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,677

    Default

    Well, before refurbishment the waterfront was mostly dismal waste ground - I know because I used to take my dogs there for a run !! We went there because it was deserted and the dogs could run loose without meeting anyone else with dogs.

  8. #158
    Senior Member lindylou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Waterways View Post


    Lindy, keep all the old for sure and extend on it, the city is still a commercial city and needs offices and accommodation to suit.

    There is nothing wrong having a quality cluster of tall buildings on the north and south end waterfronts. No more Arenas on the quays that are bland, out of character and even have cars parks on the quays as well. The Albert Dock model clearly needs emulating on most quays as it works and will bring people to the docks waters with amenities to suit. The great thing about height is that it increases population density quite quickly. The odd very tall buildings among a collection of low-rises in the quays would be nice.
    Although I do understand what NL and others are saying, (and I love our heritage buildings as much as anyone), I do agree that a cluster of stunning buildings to the south and the north of the Pierhead will look fab when completed.

    The buildings should not be boring 'any town' rectangles, but they should be unusual, eyecatching and stunning shapes.

    .. and not only is the view good from the river - I go along Everton rd frequently and the view from the hill is more interesting with the new buildings rising up in the distance.

  9. #159

    Default

    I go along Prescot Road and get a view of that horrible tower with that stupid box thingy at the top...Uuuuurgh it ruins the skyline.
    BE NICE......................OR ELSE

  10. #160
    Senior Member lindylou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spike View Post
    I go along Prescot Road and get a view of that horrible tower with that stupid box thingy at the top...Uuuuurgh it ruins the skyline.
    ha,ha, it looks a bit like a periscope from a distance

  11. #161
    Re-member Ged's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Here, there & everywhere.
    Posts
    7,197

    Default

    Nothing can look as bad as Manchester's Beetham Tower.
    www.inacityliving.piczo.com/

    Updated weekly with old and new pics.

  12. #162
    Otterspool Onomatopoeia Max's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Nowhere
    Age
    38
    Posts
    1,908

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ged View Post
    Nothing can look as bad as Manchester's Beetham Tower.
    Hahah, that is bad I agree. Beetham West craps on Manchester's one!
    Gididi Gididi Goo.

  13. #163
    Otterspool Onomatopoeia Max's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Nowhere
    Age
    38
    Posts
    1,908

    Default

    Big cities in Japan are full of skyscrapers but they manage to keep alot of cultural buildings mixed with them too and those wonderfull Cherry Blossoms along the rivers and parks too! In Osaka, they have a Castle and park right next to the Skycrapers!



    I am fan of this Osaka skycraper called "Umaeda Sky Building" because it's two joined together and theres an open escalator inbetween high up!

    Gididi Gididi Goo.

  14. #164
    Senior Member Waterways's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,924
    Blog Entries
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spike View Post
    The city is building homes, or do you choose to ignore that? look along Kensington homes are springing up. other areas are starting the process.

    What family would want to live in a tower block in the city????

    They are not meant for children. They are for outsiders, and progressive locals, of which you are are not one.
    The new Amsterdam at Liverpool?
    Save Liverpool Docks and Waterways - Click

    Deprived of its unique dockland waters Liverpool
    becomes a Venice without canals, just another city, no
    longer of special interest to anyone, least of all the
    tourist. Would we visit a modernised Venice of filled in
    canals to view its modern museum describing
    how it once was?


    Giving Liverpool a full Metro - CLICK
    Rapid-transit rail: Everton, Liverpool & Arena - CLICK

    Save Royal Iris - Sign Petition

  15. #165
    Senior Member Waterways's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,924
    Blog Entries
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spike View Post
    Why waste ground? We could build other things. .
    Like shed supermarkets? Fantastic .Just what we all need.
    The new Amsterdam at Liverpool?
    Save Liverpool Docks and Waterways - Click

    Deprived of its unique dockland waters Liverpool
    becomes a Venice without canals, just another city, no
    longer of special interest to anyone, least of all the
    tourist. Would we visit a modernised Venice of filled in
    canals to view its modern museum describing
    how it once was?


    Giving Liverpool a full Metro - CLICK
    Rapid-transit rail: Everton, Liverpool & Arena - CLICK

    Save Royal Iris - Sign Petition

Page 11 of 16 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Why didn't they just build this one?
    By Max in forum Liverpool Developments Chat
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 11-06-2006, 11:09 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •