I just read the reviews on Amazon just out of interest, and noted that one reviewer believes the book gives the definitive answer to who killed Julia Wallace. Well it doesn't. There's no way on earth that JG's conclusion is right. Julia was paying two young men for sex, her husband found out and then blackmailed the two men into becoming involved in a big plot to murder her?
The question remains "Who Killed Julia Wallace" - because as far as I'm concerned the conclusion given in the book is disrespectful to an innocent old lady, who died horribly.
div>
Prefab is right there were other far easier ways of getting rid of Julia than rather battering her to death, particularly as she did suffer frequent ill health.
Bookmarks