Originally Posted by
GeorgePorgie
Well as I've said all the long,I'll stick to Maybrick as the Ripper,too many coincidence's surround him.
div>
Biggest one is he was always in London at the time of the Murders...bit of a coincidence don't ya think,him having his home in Liverpool like,so if you can give me information on a time he wasn't in London when any of the Murders took place then you might just persuade me to look at other suspects.
Hi George
Sorry but no proof has been produced to show that Maybrick was in London at the time of the murders. Where did you get that from? Someone had the clever scheme to make Maybrick the Ripper, to link two famous Victorian murders together, but for me it's a contrived scenario and not one that that rings true.
All the best
Chris
Bookmarks