Hello Sue and Tony
div>
Welcome to the forum, Sue. I hope you enjoy your time here. I was interested to learn that like Tony you are a Maybrickite! Obviously I am not, as you read above, although I am fascinated by the "mystery" of how the Diary came to be. As I noted in my last posting, it is not outside the realm of possibility that James Maybrick could have been the Ripper, but I don't think the Diary, as it exists, proves that he was, first and foremost because it is not in his handwriting. The possibility that there could have been an earlier version of the Diary in James's writing has been suggested before, although one would think that the best proof that Maybrick was the Ripper would be to produce that original diary. What happened to it... if it ever existed???
Chris
Bookmarks