dangerous dog owner

[steveb]

What a farce, the owner of the dog that killed the little girl has been
sentenced to 8 weeks prison. Saw pictures of him arriving at court
in baseball cap etc, he didn't give a ****.....

[lindylou]

Typical ! :angry:

[Shapers]

He'll get a bigger rep now amongst the scum.

[iain]

I did a double-take when I heard it on the radio too. I know the grandmother is still on trial for manslaughter but if he didn't have the dog in the first place it wouldn't have happened so I can't see why they've treated him so leniently. Give him that sentence if the dog hadn't actually done anything to anyone, but not in this case.

:protest:

[Lady]

Shapers, :handclap:

I agree with you fully :disgust::disgust::disgust:

Jacky :)

[theninesisters]

And that he can apply for parole in 4 weeks.....

[steveb]

And that he can apply for parole in 4 weeks.....

Yes, typical. He should never had the dog in the 1st place, isn't he
being done for drugs or something as a seperate charge

[SteH]

I did a double-take when I heard it on the radio too. I know the grandmother is still on trial for manslaughter but if he didn't have the dog in the first place it wouldn't have happened so I can't see why they've treated him so leniently. Give him that sentence if the dog hadn't actually done anything to anyone, but not in this case.

:protest:

His solicitor played all the sympathy cards and looks to have fooled the judge into a token sentence - still grieving, family torn apart, he was allegedly looking for a new home for the dog since it bit someone else six weeks earlier, had kept it outside.

[chippie]

I,d put him in a cell with the dog and don,t feed the dog. That should give him his just desserts. Mind you the dog would want to change his cell being banged up with that scum:disgust:

[iain]

His solicitor played all the sympathy cards and looks to have fooled the judge into a token sentence - still grieving, family torn apart, he was allegedly looking for a new home for the dog since it bit someone else six weeks earlier, had kept it outside.

But none of that changes the fact he shouldn't have had it in the first place. I don't see why the judge gives him such pity. :disgust:

[steveb]

But none of that changes the fact he shouldn't have had it in the first place. I don't see why the judge gives him such pity. :disgust:

because of the way British justice works. He was in a magistrates court
and the bench can only send people down for 6 months max, any more
than this it has to goto crown court,even soI would have thought they
would have given him 6 months and a huge fine, mind you, " time to pay"
50p a week

[SteveFaragher]

still think he should have his testicles smeared with chappie and a very hungry pitbull let loose, I'd pay to see that on cable