PDA

View Full Version : Southampton name removed from QE2



bangorreg
09-13-2009, 02:13 AM
Hi:" Acdknowledgement to the BBC News for this information""

The QE2 is still alive?

The QE2 will no longer bear the name of its former home port Southampton.

The city's name has been replaced with the liner's temporary home port of Port Vila by its new owners, United Arab Emirates real estate developer Nakheel.

Cunard sold the ship for ?50m to Nakheel, which is now in talks to move it to Cape Town to become a hotel in time for the 2010 football World Cup.

The developer said international law required the removal of Southampton since it was now registered in Vanuatu.

The QE2 left the Drydocks World-Dubai, where it was transferred to in July for routine marine surveys in compliance with international standards, last Saturday in preparation for sea trials.

A spokesman for Nakheel said: "Although she will no longer be taking passengers or operating as a cruise ship, the registration documents will state her class as being 'a passenger/cruise ship'.

Floating hotel

"To conform to international law, the name 'Southampton' has been painted over on the stern, although the letters remain attached, and her temporary home port of Port Vila has now been painted underneath.

"To comply with the terms of the sale contract, the Cunard brand has also been removed from the side of the ship."

Nakheel had planned to refurbish the ship and open it as a floating hotel in Dubai but that has been put on hold.

The QE2 will now go to the Victoria and Alfred Waterfront in Cape Town, where there is a shortage of hotel rooms.

Nakheel, which has a financial interest in the South African port, said the ship would be staying in Cape Town for 18 months.
Reg

naked lilac
09-13-2009, 08:00 AM
QE2 is now just memories of such a glorious cruise liner of grandeur it seems, through reading that article...

No one can take away those memories for the lucky passangers that had their time upon her gliding around the World..

Sounds very sad to have to strip her of her original names..and now to lay in pasture in So. Africa as a floating hotel..

Well, I assume you can look at it, as another adventure for her.. or as where do old liners go...: To scrape, or to still being useful..???

Money talks in this scenerio.. and I am totally torn on my thoughts on this... Could of kept her in British Waters . Or made her an attraction, like they have the Queen Mary in Long Beach, California.. Kept her a museum and resturant and something to still admire for her grandeur of yesteryear...

Interesting article.. thanks for the update..:PDT11

Waterways
09-13-2009, 12:32 PM
The ship was conceived in Liverpool, but by the time it was launched Cunard were based in London not Liverpool. It originally had London on the stern. Then Southampton appeared.

I really couldn't care about a company that deserted the city, after being here for around 100 years.

The ship maybe could have been moored in Princes Dock as a hotel. The city is still short of hotels. It would be a squeeze. Certainly Brunswick Dock could hold her, if the original river locks were refitted. But in their wisdom the city fathers allowed a money making rip-off outfit who bought the docks to fill them in to inland canal barge depths. Yes a deep water port is now a canal barge-way.

captain kong
09-13-2009, 02:21 PM
Thanks for the information Reg,
I have sailed on the QE2 many times, done three world cruises on her including her final one last year. and a few Trans Ats and CapeTowns.
The price of ?50,000,000 was very cheap, there is nearly 50 millions worth of Art on board, including a Falklands War memorial to the British Forces presented by the Military to QE2, left onboard. nothing was taken off, not even a spoon. I can see the Arab Muslims appreciating a British Army Memorial and taking care of it.
I told the President of Cunard at the time that she should have been sold to Liverpool, but the deal had been done. Someone like McCartney could have bought it for the City, ?50M would have been peanuts to him and he would have been giving something back to the City. What is he saving up for at his age?.
My plan would have been to have her in a tideless lagoon opposite the Cunard building where she was first designed, very similar to the Queen Mary in Long Beach, Cal. I have stayed on her many times and she is fantastic. Well worth a visit if you are over that side.
Six Deck, crew accommodation, could have been used for Student accommodation
Five Deck could have been class rooms for the University,
Four Deck could have been Offices for Liverpool businesses,
Three Deck could have been used as conference centres,
Two Deck would have been restaraunts, theatres, shows and entertainments.
One Deck and above could have been hotel accommodation. Many people could have weekends on board or holidays. A wedding Chapel as well. There would have been a lot of space for a maritime museum.
That ship would have employed a couple of thousand people to operate and maintain it. It would have been a superb tourist attraction.both for guests and day visitors.
Liverpool has lost out again on a great money spinner for the City.

What after Cape Town? Alang Beach in Pakistan?, that big graveyard of many fine ships.
Maybe your next car will be made of steel from her.

Paddy6
09-13-2009, 10:55 PM
Sorry to hear that news but I guess it had to happen. At least there's a good few more years for her as a floating hotel. Sad to see the end of a beautiful ship:

http://www.maritimematters.com/mall_alang_pk.html

brian daley
09-13-2009, 11:03 PM
This is the last I saw of the QE11,berthed at Belem and the leaving Portugal as she passed beneath the Tagus bridge. Magnificent!!
BrianD

bangorreg
09-15-2009, 07:01 AM
Hi QE2 leaves England for the last time on Utube...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pmp3U1vmidU

Reg

captain kong
09-15-2009, 10:09 AM
Fantastic films of QE2 there Reg, I have saved them for future reference.
I have sailed further on that ship than on any other ship in my seafaring career.

Sean SE16
09-15-2009, 11:01 AM
It would take more than a squeeze to get the QE2 into Princes Dock! Even the B&I car ferries of the 1960s were too wide at 18m, the QE2 is 32m beam. I don't know the original width of the Brunswick Lock, but I doubt that it was Panamax width.

Also I can't recall the QE2 ever being registered in London, all the photos I have seen from her early days all had Southampton on the stern. The last Cunard ship to be registered in Liverpool was the Atlantic Conveyor (2), but she has switched to Swedish registry since Cunard sold their stake in ACL.

captain kong
09-15-2009, 11:49 AM
You are right Sean.
QE2 was launched with Southampton Registry.
Cunard moved its Headquarters to Southampton not London. At the time its passenger liner operations had more or less ceased in Liverpool and most of its fleet were sailing from Southampton, so it made sense for ther head office to be there.
I worked for Cunard and sailed as A.B. and Quartermaster on many of its ships, also since retirement sailed world wide many times on their cruise ships, Caronia, QE2, Queen Mary 2.

Definately a tight squeeze to get into the dock.
Tonnage: 70,327 GT (gross tonnage)
Displacement: 48,923 (loaded)
Length: 293.5 m (962.9 ft)
Beam: 32.03 m (105.1 ft)
Height: 52.2 m (171.3 ft)
Draft: 9.87 m (32.4 ft
Cunard was bought by the Carnival Corporation in 1998

Here is QE2 squeezing into the Locks in the Panama Canal last year on her final world cruise. she had about one foot on either side.

Waterways
09-15-2009, 12:28 PM
At 32ft draft it "may" squeeze into the Brunswick. The two locks of the Brunswick have to be made into one. opening the locks again, may have been cheaper than building a whole new hotel.

The real point is that other attractive looking smaller cruise ships could have been made into hotels and fitted into the redundant docks near the city centre. Being berthed in the river is not that appealing. But they cannot do it in Princes as it is an inland canal barge-way. Brunswick is still full depth - maybe needs some dredging.

Berger
09-15-2009, 04:32 PM
Thanks for the information Reg,
I have sailed on the QE2 many times, done three world cruises on her including her final one last year. and a few Trans Ats and CapeTowns.
The price of ?50,000,000 was very cheap, there is nearly 50 millions worth of Art on board, including a Falklands War memorial to the British Forces presented by the Military to QE2, left onboard. nothing was taken off, not even a spoon. I can see the Arab Muslims appreciating a British Army Memorial and taking care of it.
I told the President of Cunard at the time that she should have been sold to Liverpool, but the deal had been done. Someone like McCartney could have bought it for the City, ?50M would have been peanuts to him and he would have been giving something back to the City. What is he saving up for at his age?.
My plan would have been to have her in a tideless lagoon opposite the Cunard building where she was first designed, very similar to the Queen Mary in Long Beach, Cal. I have stayed on her many times and she is fantastic. Well worth a visit if you are over that side.
Six Deck, crew accommodation, could have been used for Student accommodation
Five Deck could have been class rooms for the University,
Four Deck could have been Offices for Liverpool businesses,
Three Deck could have been used as conference centres,
Two Deck would have been restaraunts, theatres, shows and entertainments.
One Deck and above could have been hotel accommodation. Many people could have weekends on board or holidays. A wedding Chapel as well. There would have been a lot of space for a maritime museum.
That ship would have employed a couple of thousand people to operate and maintain it. It would have been a superb tourist attraction.both for guests and day visitors.
Liverpool has lost out again on a great money spinner for the City.

What after Cape Town? Alang Beach in Pakistan?, that big graveyard of many fine ships.
Maybe your next car will be made of steel from her.

Obviously a man of influence getting the ear of the President of Cunard, it?s a pity you didn?t tell him before the deal was done; the QE2 would have been an excellent tourist attraction for Liverpool.

captain kong
09-15-2009, 04:47 PM
The President of Cunard is an attractive young lady, Carol Marlow, We have sailed with her a few times, had drinks with her at cocktail parties when she has been on board. and met her in Liverpool when QE2 opened the new Terminal. The Master, now retired, was a good friend of mine for many years and he introduced me to her.
Photos.........
Carol, at the New Cruise Terminal at Liverpool with QE2 alongside, on 21st of September 2007, Anne and I were invited as VIPs. She is also presenting the Lord Mayor of Liverpool with a picture of QE2,, Warren Bradley, the Leader of Liverpool City Council, is behind the picture, the man with the bald head in front is HRH, The Duke of Kent.
President and Chief Executive Officer, Carol Marlow, is about to leave Cunard and become President and Managing Director of P & O.
Peter Shanks is now taking over as President and Managing Director of Cunard.

wsteve55
09-17-2009, 12:34 AM
With Concorde gone,and now the QE2,what have we got to show?:snf (41):

captain kong
09-17-2009, 11:29 AM
NOT A LOT WSTEVE, NOT A LOT.

An excellent site for news of QE2`s future in Cape Town.

Chris' Cunard Page - www.chriscunard.com




About QE2 | QE2 History | QE2 Today | The Review | Farewell | QE2 Decks | Images | Bookings

















About QE2 | QE2 History | QE2 Today | The Review | Farewell | QE2 Decks | Images | Bookings

Ronijayne
09-17-2009, 07:28 PM
QE2 is American owned though isn't she? I was on for 13 months 1987 and 1988 and she was American owned then. My cabin was 5151 I think. Memories!!

I am in East Hampton now, was in Southampton yesterday for lunch and pottering around. The Hamptons, long Island NY of course!!

Been to 'real' So'ton many, many times.

Off back to the beach. They have a computer room here at the resort, I had not known this before yesterday. The room is opposite my cabin too!!!

captain kong
09-17-2009, 08:22 PM
QE2 as from last November, 2008, is now owned by Nakheel of Dubai.
When it was built in 1969 it was owned by the Cunard Line, it was registered in Southampton and flew the Red Ensign of the British Merchant Navy, it remained a British ship until its sale to Nakheel last November, 2008.
In 1971 Cunard Line was sold to a British Construction Company, Trafalgar House,
In 1996 Cunard Line was sold again to the Norwegian Company, Kvaerner.
The United States company, Carnival Corporation, in 1998 bought 68% of the shares from Kvaerner and then in 1999 bought the remaing 32% of the shares and became the owner of the Cunard Line.
All Cunard`s Liners, [ QE2,] Queen Mary 2 and Queen Victoria are British registered ships Flying the Red Ensign of the British Merchant Navy. The new Queen Elizabeth now under construction will also be a British ship registered in Britain under the Red Ensign.

Nakheel has registered QE2 in Port Vila, in Vanuatu and now flies the flag of that nation.
Her British radio call sign was `GBTT` that had to be changed to, `YJVW6`

ChrisGeorge
09-17-2009, 10:03 PM
Thanks for the information Reg,
I have sailed on the QE2 many times, done three world cruises on her including her final one last year. and a few Trans Ats and CapeTowns.
The price of ?50,000,000 was very cheap, there is nearly 50 millions worth of Art on board, including a Falklands War memorial to the British Forces presented by the Military to QE2, left onboard. nothing was taken off, not even a spoon. I can see the Arab Muslims appreciating a British Army Memorial and taking care of it.
I told the President of Cunard at the time that she should have been sold to Liverpool, but the deal had been done. Someone like McCartney could have bought it for the City, ?50M would have been peanuts to him and he would have been giving something back to the City. What is he saving up for at his age?.
My plan would have been to have her in a tideless lagoon opposite the Cunard building where she was first designed, very similar to the Queen Mary in Long Beach, Cal. I have stayed on her many times and she is fantastic. Well worth a visit if you are over that side.
Six Deck, crew accommodation, could have been used for Student accommodation
Five Deck could have been class rooms for the University,
Four Deck could have been Offices for Liverpool businesses,
Three Deck could have been used as conference centres,
Two Deck would have been restaraunts, theatres, shows and entertainments.
One Deck and above could have been hotel accommodation. Many people could have weekends on board or holidays. A wedding Chapel as well. There would have been a lot of space for a maritime museum.
That ship would have employed a couple of thousand people to operate and maintain it. It would have been a superb tourist attraction.both for guests and day visitors.
Liverpool has lost out again on a great money spinner for the City.

What after Cape Town? Alang Beach in Pakistan?, that big graveyard of many fine ships.
Maybe your next car will be made of steel from her.

Sad. Sad. Sad. You have some great ideas there, Captain, on what could have been done with her if she had come to Liverpool. Another of those great what if's. :rolleyes:

Chris

Ronijayne
09-18-2009, 11:10 PM
QE2 as from last November, 2008, is now owned by Nakheel of Dubai.
When it was built in 1969 it was owned by the Cunard Line, it was registered in Southampton and flew the Red Ensign of the British Merchant Navy, it remained a British ship until its sale to Nakheel last November, 2008.
In 1971 Cunard Line was sold to a British Construction Company, Trafalgar House,
In 1996 Cunard Line was sold again to the Norwegian Company, Kvaerner.
The United States company, Carnival Corporation, in 1998 bought 68% of the shares from Kvaerner and then in 1999 bought the remaing 32% of the shares and became the owner of the Cunard Line.
All Cunard`s Liners, [ QE2,] Queen Mary 2 and Queen Victoria are British registered ships Flying the Red Ensign of the British Merchant Navy. The new Queen Elizabeth now under construction will also be a British ship registered in Britain under the Red Ensign.

Nakheel has registered QE2 in Port Vila, in Vanuatu and now flies the flag of that nation.
Her British radio call sign was `GBTT` that had to be changed to, `YJVW6`

Captain of QE2 in 1988 had to ask American permission for everything. Carnival own Cunard and that I imagine is why QM2 is the same ugly shape as Carnival ships.

I still have my key to cabin 5151:shock:

Ronijayne
09-18-2009, 11:12 PM
Won't Carnival own the new ship???

captain kong
09-19-2009, 12:26 AM
QM2 was designed by a British Naval Architect, Stephen Paine, I sailed with him on QM2`s maiden Voyage She is a magnificent ship. I have done a few long voyages on her.

In 1988 The Captain of any Cunard Liner did not have to ask the Americans for anything.
see,..........
[PDF] CUNARD HISTORY AT A GLANCE
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View
CUNARD HISTORY AT A GLANCE. 1839. Samuel Cunard establishes the British and North American Steam Packet. Company ? known as the Cunard Line ? principally to ...
www.cunard.com/images/Content/History.pdf - Similar

Cunard will own the new QE but Carnival is the parent company because it owns Cunard.
The new QE will be of British registry and will sail under the British Red Ensign. She will be a British ship even tho` Carnival own it.

wsteve55
09-19-2009, 12:58 AM
Makes you wonder why? Is there any advantage?

Johnny Robbo
09-19-2009, 02:24 AM
Makes you wonder why? Is there any advantage?

The American owners clearly recognise the history of Cunard and the value of its trading name. It would undoubtedly diminish the Cunard brand value if their high profile liners named after members of the British Royal family were
registered outside the UK.

Ronijayne
09-19-2009, 05:44 PM
QM2 was designed by a British Naval Architect, Stephen Paine, I sailed with him on QM2`s maiden Voyage She is a magnificent ship. I have done a few long voyages on her.

In 1988 The Captain of any Cunard Liner did not have to ask the Americans for anything.
see,..........
[PDF] CUNARD HISTORY AT A GLANCE
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View
CUNARD HISTORY AT A GLANCE. 1839. Samuel Cunard establishes the British and North American Steam Packet. Company ? known as the Cunard Line ? principally to ...
www.cunard.com/images/Content/History.pdf - Similar

Cunard will own the new QE but Carnival is the parent company because it owns Cunard.
The new QE will be of British registry and will sail under the British Red Ensign. She will be a British ship even tho` Carnival own it.

Really! I have been on QM2 also. I hated the Carnival shape of her and at night she looks like a vegas nightclub with that huge lit up sign. Being part of a 'British fleet' was why the Americans bought Cunard.

Ronijayne
09-19-2009, 05:47 PM
Makes you wonder why? Is there any advantage?


It is the 'British' bit they bought Steve.

When we used to be coming into a mega storm and the captain wanted to go through it and not around he had to call for permission. We all hated that. Silly of us really as they do own it.

captain kong
09-19-2009, 06:47 PM
When we used to be coming into a mega storm and the captain wanted to go through it and not around he had to call for permission. We all hated that. Silly of us really as they do own it.

When I was Master or Captain, I never ever once asked the Office if I could alter course, That is the reason for having Masters on ships, they are the professionals who know their ships and how to handle them in any situation.
How do the office people know what weather conditions are like??? Are they expert ship handlers??? Do they understand the effects of weather, also depending, is it from ahead, astern, on the beam.
Are the Office Staff home in bed when the weather changes and the Captain calls saying "What do I do now" ??? Do they get up and look through the window of their apartment in New York and say "The weather is OK here whats it like in the South Atlantic??. No you cannot have permission to alter course."
Cunard and every other Company I have ever worked for in 47 years of seafaring have never told their Captains to contact the office and ask permission before altering course. Captains are paid to make the decision as they see it. No one in an Office thousands of miles away have a clue what is going on.

ChrisGeorge
09-19-2009, 09:16 PM
When we used to be coming into a mega storm and the captain wanted to go through it and not around he had to call for permission. We all hated that. Silly of us really as they do own it.

When I was Master or Captain, I never ever once asked the Office if I could alter course, That is the reason for having Masters on ships, they are the professionals who know their ships and how to handle them in any situation.
How do the office people know what weather conditions are like??? Are they expert ship handlers??? Do they understand the effects of weather, also depending, is it from ahead, astern, on the beam. . . .

Well said here, mate. The captain is master of the ship for a reason. :handclap:

Chris :PDT_Aliboronz_24:

wsteve55
09-19-2009, 09:27 PM
It is the 'British' bit they bought Steve.

When we used to be coming into a mega storm and the captain wanted to go through it and not around he had to call for permission. We all hated that. Silly of us really as they do own it.

If the"British" brand, is what was important,why dont we own Rolls Royce,etc! It seems a contradiction that the brand is great,except when it's owned by us,so it's sold off,and re-invented,then, given back to us!? (does this make sense?):noid:

Berger
09-20-2009, 04:06 AM
When we used to be coming into a mega storm and the captain wanted to go through it and not around he had to call for permission. We all hated that. Silly of us really as they do own it.

When I was Master or Captain, I never ever once asked the Office if I could alter course, That is the reason for having Masters on ships, they are the professionals who know their ships and how to handle them in any situation.
How do the office people know what weather conditions are like??? Are they expert ship handlers??? Do they understand the effects of weather, also depending, is it from ahead, astern, on the beam.
Are the Office Staff home in bed when the weather changes and the Captain calls saying "What do I do now" ??? Do they get up and look through the window of their apartment in New York and say "The weather is OK here whats it like in the South Atlantic??. No you cannot have permission to alter course."
Cunard and every other Company I have ever worked for in 47 years of seafaring have never told their Captains to contact the office and ask permission before altering course. Captains are paid to make the decision as they see it. No one in an Office thousands of miles away have a clue what is going on.

I concur!
Did you sail as master with Cunard, which companies were you captain with?

naked lilac
09-20-2009, 06:58 AM
Captain Kong.. Priceless.. You said it so well.. and congrads on a life long profession you loved to do... :PDT_Aliboronz_24:


Your stories and contributions to this forum are excellant!

captain kong
09-20-2009, 10:33 AM
If you read page one of this thread........

...............I worked for Cunard and sailed as A.B. and Quartermaster on many of its ships, also since retirement sailed world wide many times on their cruise ships, Caronia, QE2, Queen Mary 2.

Ronijayne
09-20-2009, 04:49 PM
If the"British" brand, is what was important,why dont we own Rolls Royce,etc! It seems a contradiction that the brand is great,except when it's owned by us,so it's sold off,and re-invented,then, given back to us!? (does this make sense?):noid:


I HATE that we do not own all the wonderful companies that were once ours. I was also very shocked that we don't own much of what I thought we did. We don't even own Weetabix anymore, lol

There is a lot of 'buying the name' Steve. When say, Tiffany is sold, the new owners buy the name too. It is not owned by the Louis Comfort Tiffany family now so you buy the name therefore buying all the good will and fame that goes with it.

Ronijayne
09-20-2009, 04:58 PM
When we used to be coming into a mega storm and the captain wanted to go through it and not around he had to call for permission. We all hated that. Silly of us really as they do own it.

When I was Master or Captain, I never ever once asked the Office if I could alter course, That is the reason for having Masters on ships, they are the professionals who know their ships and how to handle them in any situation.
How do the office people know what weather conditions are like??? Are they expert ship handlers??? Do they understand the effects of weather, also depending, is it from ahead, astern, on the beam.
Are the Office Staff home in bed when the weather changes and the Captain calls saying "What do I do now" ??? Do they get up and look through the window of their apartment in New York and say "The weather is OK here whats it like in the South Atlantic??. No you cannot have permission to alter course."
Cunard and every other Company I have ever worked for in 47 years of seafaring have never told their Captains to contact the office and ask permission before altering course. Captains are paid to make the decision as they see it. No one in an Office thousands of miles away have a clue what is going on.

Why are you getting in a tizzy over this:PDT_Piratz_26: It is of no matter to me. I just remember that the officers were VERY mad when we were headed for a huge storm and the captain was wanting to go through it and had to argue with who they just refered to as 'the Americans'

Is the red ensign the red flag at the back of the ship? We were told that was flown only when the captain was ROYAL NAVY, if he was merchant navy it could not be flown.

We had to join the merchant navy before we got on the ship! I had a lifeboat I was in charge of at lifeboat drills, we had to do the fire course as well as a few more I cannot remember. When I left the ship I had to 'sign off' from the navy!!! I still have my certificates somewhere.

ChrisGeorge
09-20-2009, 04:59 PM
I HATE that we do not own all the wonderful companies that were once ours. I was also very shocked that we don't own much of what I thought we did. We don't even own Weetabix anymore, lol

There is a lot of 'buying the name' Steve. When say, Tiffany is sold, the new owners buy the name too. It is not owned by the Louis Comfort Tiffany family now so you buy the name therefore buying all the good will and fame that goes with it.

Weetabix, one of my favorite cereals, appears to be still British owned. See this:

"Weetabix of Canada Ltd. was incorporated in 1975 and is the subsidiary company of Weetabix Ltd., the leading British cereal manufacturer. The Weetabix? brand is the single largest selling ready-to-eat cereal brand in the United Kingdom where it has been manufactured since the 1930s."

About Us Wheetabix Canada at http://www.weetabix.ca/en/aboutus.php

"Company History:

Privately held, family-controlled (and some say ultra-secretive) Weetabix Limited is one of the United Kingdom's leading makers of branded and private-label cereals. The company also has strong manufacturing operations in the United States and Canada and exports products to a variety of countries, including much of Europe. While slugging it out for market share against such cereal behemoths as Kellogg's and Nestl?, Weetabix has managed to thrive by establishing clear leadership in a limited number of cereal segments. Weetabix's flagship product is, of course, its renowned Weetabix branded cereal, a pressed wheat biscuit designed to turn to mush in milk--making it a favorite food choice across generations. Weetabix has also been a pioneer of the muesli market, under its popular Alpen brand, originally launched in 1971. With its Ready Brek brand, Weetabix is the market leader in the instant hot cereal category as well. Other brands in the Weetabix portfolio include Weetos and Nature's Choice granola bars. In addition to its small branded range, Weetabix has built a strong private-label operation, through subsidiaries Ryecroft Foods in the United Kingdom and Northern Golden Foods in Canada, as well as at its U.S. production facility in Clinton, Massachusetts. Weetabix also operates its own packaging subsidiary, Vibixa Limited, supporting its own products as well as its private-label production. Weetabix is led by Richard George, a member of the family that has controlled Weetabix since the 1940s. Nonvoting shares of the private company are nonetheless listed on the tiny OFEX exchange, designed to provide liquidity for small companies."

From "Weetabix Limited" at http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/Weetabix-Limited-Company-History.html

I hasten to add that as far as I know Richard George and his family are not relatives of mine, though there may be some distant connection. :PDT_Aliboronz_24:

Chris

Ronijayne
09-20-2009, 05:00 PM
If you read page one of this thread........

...............I worked for Cunard and sailed as A.B. and Quartermaster on many of its ships, also since retirement sailed world wide many times on their cruise ships, Caronia, QE2, Queen Mary 2.

Yes, I can read but thank you.

Ronijayne
09-20-2009, 05:03 PM
Weetabix, one of my favorite cereals, appears to be still British owned. See this:

"Weetabix of Canada Ltd. was incorporated in 1975 and is the subsidiary company of Weetabix Ltd., the leading British cereal manufacturer. The Weetabix? brand is the single largest selling ready-to-eat cereal brand in the United Kingdom where it has been manufactured since the 1930s."

About Us Wheetabix Canada at http://www.weetabix.ca/en/aboutus.php

"Company History:

Privately held, family-controlled (and some say ultra-secretive) Weetabix Limited is one of the United Kingdom's leading makers of branded and private-label cereals. The company also has strong manufacturing operations in the United States and Canada and exports products to a variety of countries, including much of Europe. While slugging it out for market share against such cereal behemoths as Kellogg's and Nestl?, Weetabix has managed to thrive by establishing clear leadership in a limited number of cereal segments. Weetabix's flagship product is, of course, its renowned Weetabix branded cereal, a pressed wheat biscuit designed to turn to mush in milk--making it a favorite food choice across generations. Weetabix has also been a pioneer of the muesli market, under its popular Alpen brand, originally launched in 1971. With its Ready Brek brand, Weetabix is the market leader in the instant hot cereal category as well. Other brands in the Weetabix portfolio include Weetos and Nature's Choice granola bars. In addition to its small branded range, Weetabix has built a strong private-label operation, through subsidiaries Ryecroft Foods in the United Kingdom and Northern Golden Foods in Canada, as well as at its U.S. production facility in Clinton, Massachusetts. Weetabix also operates its own packaging subsidiary, Vibixa Limited, supporting its own products as well as its private-label production. Weetabix is led by Richard George, a member of the family that has controlled Weetabix since the 1940s. Nonvoting shares of the private company are nonetheless listed on the tiny OFEX exchange, designed to provide liquidity for small companies."

From "Weetabix Limited" at http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/Weetabix-Limited-Company-History.html

I hasten to add that as far as I know Richard George and his family are not relatives of mine, though there may be some distant connection. :PDT_Aliboronz_24:

Chris

Wow, I think my time has come and gone on here. I do not care to argue every time I post.

Do you not want women on here. Yikes fellers. Just say so,

ChrisGeorge
09-20-2009, 05:42 PM
Wow, I think my time has come and gone on here. I do not care to argue every time I post.

Do you not want women on here. Yikes fellers. Just say so,

Hey what?

I'm just trying to assure you that Wheetabix does still seems to have British ownership, which I agree is surprising.

Cheers

Chris :PDT_Aliboronz_24:

captain kong
09-20-2009, 07:18 PM
Ronijayne, if you were on QE2 in 1988 then one of these fine men would have been Master.
Each one was very experienced and I know them, having sailed with them, Not one would have to ask the office, they were Master in all that that title is

Masters of QE2
Captain A. C. Bennell, R.D., R.N.R.
10 July 1987
Captain R. A. Woodall, R.D., R.N.R.
1 November 1987
Commodore J. Burton-Hall, R.D., Cdr. R.N.R.
7 March 1990

Why are you getting in a tizzy over this It is of no matter to me. I just remember that the officers were VERY mad when we were headed for a huge storm and the captain was wanting to go through it and had to argue with who they just refered to as 'the Americans'

Is the red ensign the red flag at the back of the ship? We were told that was flown only when the captain was ROYAL NAVY, if he was merchant navy it could not be flown.

We had to join the merchant navy before we got on the ship! I had a lifeboat I was in charge of at lifeboat drills, we had to do the fire course as well as a few more I cannot remember. When I left the ship I had to 'sign off' from the navy!!! I still have my certificates somewhere.

In 1988 Cunard was still British owned by Trafalgar House in London. No Americans involved. Were you privy with the Master`s conversations with the "Americans" ? In the wheel house would only be the two Quartermasters, the two Officers of the watch and the Master.
and how could "the Americans" know what the situation was thousands of miles away. Impossible.
The British Red Ensign is flown aft on all British registered Merchant ships. When a ships Master is a member of the Royal Navy Reserve, RNR, as most Cunard Masters were, he is entitled to fly the Blue Ensign, not all of them did it, it was their preference.

When I left the ship I had to 'sign off' from the navy!!! I still have my certificates somewhere.

It sounds a strange "navy" you were in. Doesnt sound like the one I was in all my working life.

pablo42
09-21-2009, 01:33 AM
Wow, I think my time has come and gone on here. I do not care to argue every time I post.

Do you not want women on here. Yikes fellers. Just say so,

It's gettin' to you Roni. Reckon you need another break. Me for one wants you on here with your Hollywood lifestyle. I need a role model.

naked lilac
09-21-2009, 01:47 AM
Captain Kong.. Priceless.. You said it so well.. and congrads on a life long profession you loved to do... :PDT_Aliboronz_24:


Your stories and contributions to this forum are excellant!

I am noting this above statement, one more time.

I am also a woman, and I do not think this thread should reflect any gender. Its' about a mans' life long knowledge.

You can either appreciate it, or, if you need a question answered.. , then, do so without that feeling of who knows more...

Obviously, my choice would be a man (Captain) that sailed the seven seas and then some... I appreciate people with great knowledge and accomplishments in their chosen fields... You can learn alot from these folks..

I am too a Professional at what I do.. I understand that some words maybe taken derogatory to someone whose has reached that pinnacle of knowledge..

Ronijayne.. I just think they were trying to tell you their knowledge ..and don't take it as gender attitude..or personally.. Your contributions are also warrented ... ta:PDT_Aliboronz_24:

M6AJJ
09-21-2009, 08:16 AM
Well said, we need all the different opinions on here, it is what makes it so interesting. Ronijayne, we need you as much as Captain Kong so please don't take offence!

captain kong
09-21-2009, 11:57 AM
Hey, Ronajaine, we love you, no one is getting at you, next time I am in Manhattan I will take you for dinner. I enjoy ladies on this site, I enjoy ladies anywhere. it would be a very boring site if there were none. It is good to have a difference of opinion, that is what a debate is all about and we can all learn from other peoples experiences. There are too many boring sites where people just agree or make a one line comment. Lets have some more constructive comments.
As long as there are no personal insults lets talk about everything and enjoy it.
Cheers
Brian.

wsteve55
09-22-2009, 01:41 AM
Wow, I think my time has come and gone on here. I do not care to argue every time I post.

Do you not want women on here. Yikes fellers. Just say so,

Of course, you are wanted,but remember,this is the net,where you(and myself) can misinterpret the "meaning" of the typed word,quite easily,so stay where you are!!(that's a command:cha (41):)

bangorreg
09-23-2009, 05:06 AM
Laying the wooden deck during construction of the Liner QE2: (Note Capt Kong is ready with the Plumb Line)
Reg